Impact of chemical weed management in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) on productivity, quality and economics

被引:2
作者
Grzanka, Monika [1 ]
Sobiech, Lukasz [1 ]
Idziak, Robert [1 ]
Filipczak, Arkadiusz [1 ]
Skrzypczak, Grzegorz [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Fac Agr Hort & Bioengn, Agron Dept, Poznan, Poland
关键词
Conviso Smart; herbicides; microdoses; split doses; weeds; yield; YIELD; HERBICIDES; RESIDUE; SOIL; L;
D O I
10.24425/jppr.2023.146878
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weeds in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) can contribute to a significant reduction in the root yield. The species composition of these plants is an important factor influencing the competition with crops. The aim of the 2-year field experiment with mixtures of: phenmedipham + ethofumesate + metamitron + quinmerac; ethofumesate + metamitron + metamitron + + quinmerac + triflusulfuron-methyl; phenmedipham + ethofumesate + metamitron + + quinmerac + triflusulfuron-methyl + clopyralid + lenacil, and phenmedipham + ethofumesate + metamitron + quinmerac + triflusulfuron-methyl + clopyralid applied in split doses, microdoses and Conviso Smart technology was to determine the weed species community composition and effectiveness of weed control strategies. The most common species occurring in both years were: Chenopodium album L., Fallopia convolvulus L., and Geranium pusillum L. The communities had the highest values of biodiversity indices in 2020 and lower values in 2021. There were no statistically significant differences in the herbicidal effectiveness of the tested herbicidal technologies over both years of research and for individual main weed species - 95-99%. The use of all herbicide variants contributed to achieving significantly higher yields than untreated treatments, and contributed to an increase in profitability of cultivation, but this result depended on the selected strategy. The presented herbicide solutions were characterized by direct income at a similar level.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 467
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abou-Zied Kh.A., 2017, Journal of Plant production, V8, P1295, DOI [10.21608/JPP.2017.41983, DOI 10.21608/JPP.2017.41983, 10.21608/jpp.2017.41983]
  • [2] The yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots cultivated in mulches
    Artyszak, A.
    Gozdowski, D.
    Kucinska, K.
    [J]. PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 60 (10) : 464 - 469
  • [3] The effect of fertilizers on the efficacy of the bioherbicide, Phoma macrostoma, to control dandelions in turfgrass
    Bailey, Karen L.
    Falk, Stuart
    Derby, Jo-Anne
    Melzer, Melody
    Boland, Greg J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2013, 65 (01) : 147 - 151
  • [4] Weed Control in Sugarbeet
    Cioni, Franco
    Maines, Gianfranco
    [J]. SUGAR TECH, 2010, 12 (3-4) : 243 - 255
  • [5] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2023, US
  • [6] Gawda D., 2016, Acta Agrophysica, V23, P175
  • [7] Survey of efficacy trials for Conviso® One in sugar beet
    Goetze, Philipp
    Kenter, Christine
    Wendt, Moritz Jasper
    Ladewig, Erwin
    [J]. 28TH GERMAN CONFERENCE ON WEED BIOLOGY AND WEED CONTROL, 2018, 458 : 498 - 500
  • [8] Diversity of Tree Species in Gap Regeneration under Tropical Moist Semi-Deciduous Forest: An Example from Bia Tano Forest Reserve
    Hammond, Maame Esi
    Pokorny, Radek
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (08):
  • [9] ICUMSA, 2022, ICUMSA Methods Book 2022. International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis
  • [10] Measuring diversity: looking for processes that generate diversity
    Iglesias-Rios, Ricardo
    Mazzoni, Rosana
    [J]. NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2014, 12 (02): : 156 - 161