Public and private economic benefits of adopting conservation tillage for cotton pollination

被引:12
作者
Cusser, Sarah [1 ,6 ]
Jha, Shalene [2 ,3 ]
Lonsdorf, Eric [4 ,5 ]
Ricketts, Taylor [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Santa Barbara Bot Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Rd, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Integrat Biol, Biol Labs 401, 205W 24th St, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Ctr, 4801 Crosse Ave, Austin, TX 78739 USA
[4] Emory Coll, Dept Environm Sci, Oxford, GA, England
[5] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Environm, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
Ecological Intensification; Gossypium hirsutum; InVEST; Bee pollination; WILD BEE ABUNDANCE; CROP; LANDSCAPES; SERVICES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108251
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Enhancing pollinator communities and the services they provide within agricultural landscapes is a global priority. Despite the advantages of floral strips or hedgerows as part of pollinator habitat enhancement efforts, opportunity costs incurred by removing land from agricultural production can outweigh the benefits of enhanced pollination to remaining crops. Conservation tillage is a practice that has the potential to improve habitat while maintaining agricultural productivity. By leaving soil largely undisturbed, conservation tillage could improve nesting habitat for ground nesting bees within fields, as well as provide source habitat for pollinators foraging in neighboring habitat. Cotton, a crop of tremendous national and global value, benefits from insect pollination, but has the lowest adoption of conservation tillage of any major US crop. In this study, we focus on the cotton-growing community of Refugio County, Texas to estimate the effect of conservation tillage on key pollinators, quantify the resulting changes in pollination limitation, and partition benefits to private and external beneficiaries. We find that for every 1% adoption of conservation tillage, we see a county-wide benefit of roughly $16,000 USD. Assuming the costs of adopting conservation tillage are low, we demonstrate that the benefits are largely private, accruing collectively to owners instead of neighboring farms. Interestingly, even with 100% conservation tillage, our modeling shows that the county would still suffer lost revenue due to inadequate pollination, indicating a role for additional pollinator habitat enhancement efforts. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that growers can cost-effectively enhance habitat and alleviate pollen limitation, increasing crop yield and farmer income, without removing land from cultivation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Nesting habitat of ground-nesting bees: a review [J].
Antoine, Cecile M. ;
Forrest, Jessica R. K. .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 46 (02) :143-159
[2]   Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment [J].
Busari, Mutiu Abolanle ;
Kukal, Surinder Singh ;
Kaur, Amanpreet ;
Bhatt, Rajan ;
Dulazi, Ashura Ally .
INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2015, 3 (02) :119-129
[3]   What do we know about cover crop efficacy in the North Central United States? [J].
Cates, Anna M. ;
Sanford, Gregg R. ;
Good, Laura Ward ;
Jackson, Randall D. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2018, 73 (06) :A153-A157
[4]  
Claassen R., 2018, Tillage intensity and conservation cropping in the United States No. 1476-2018, DOI DOI 10.1073/PNAS.2001403117
[5]   Unexpected functional complementarity from non-bee pollinators enhances cotton yield [J].
Cusser, Sarah ;
Haddad, Nick M. ;
Jha, Shalene .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 314
[6]   Long-term research avoids spurious and misleading trends in sustainability attributes of no-till [J].
Cusser, Sarah ;
Bahlai, Christie ;
Swinton, Scott M. ;
Robertson, G. Philip ;
Haddad, Nick M. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (06) :3715-3725
[7]   Land-use history drives contemporary pollinator community similarity [J].
Cusser, Sarah ;
Neff, John L. ;
Jha, Shalene .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (08) :1335-1351
[8]   Natural land cover drives pollinator abundance and richness, leading to reductions in pollen limitation in cotton agroecosystems [J].
Cusser, Sarah ;
Neff, John L. ;
Jha, Shalene .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 226 :33-42
[9]   High cover of hedgerows in the landscape supports multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean cereal fields [J].
Dainese, Matteo ;
Montecchiari, Silvia ;
Sitzia, Tommaso ;
Sigura, Maurizia ;
Marini, Lorenzo .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (02) :380-388
[10]   Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops [J].
Daryanto, Stefani ;
Fu, Bojie ;
Wang, Lixin ;
Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre ;
Zhao, Wenwu .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2018, 185 :357-373