Using Inconsistency Reduction Algorithms in Comparison Matrices to Improve the Performance of Generating Random Comparison Matrices with a Given Inconsistency Coefficient Range

被引:2
作者
Kuras, Pawel [1 ]
Gerka, Alicja [1 ]
机构
[1] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Dept Complex Syst, Ul MC Sklodowskiej 8, PL-35036 Rzeszow, Poland
关键词
algorithm; pairwise comparison; inconsistency ratio; generate; new online tool; DECISION-MAKING; PAIRWISE; CONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.12913/22998624/158019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to present a new method for generating random pairwise comparison matrices with a given inconsistency ratio (CR) interval using inconsistency reduction algorithms. Pairwise comparison (PC) is a popular technique for multi-criteria decision-making, its purpose is to assign weights to the compared entities, thus ranking them from best to worst. The presented method combines the traditional random generation of comparison matrices supported by inconsistency reduction algorithms: the "Xu and Wei" algorithm and the "Szybowski" algorithm. This paper presents research that shows an increase in performance when generating such matrices relative to the standard random comparison matrix generation procedure using the "Szybowski" algorithm. The other algorithms also improve the process, but to a lesser extent, making the "Szybowski" supporting algorithm the preferred solution for the new process. As a result of the research, a free online tool "PC MATRICES GENERATOR" has also been made available to efficiently generate a large number of comparison matrices with a given CR factor range, any matrix size, and any number of matrices, enabling much more efficient and less time-consuming research in many fields that use comparison matrices, as the analytic hierarchy/network process (AHP/ANP), ELECTREE, PAPRIKA, PROMETHE, VIKOR or the Best-Worst method (BWM).
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 229
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Inconsistency reduction in decision making via multi-objective optimisation [J].
Abel, Edward ;
Mikhailov, Ludmil ;
Keane, John .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 267 (01) :212-226
[2]  
Alkhairi P., 2019, J PHYS C SERIES, V1255
[3]   Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes [J].
Benitez, J. ;
Delgado-Galvan, X. ;
Izquierdo, J. ;
Perez-Garcia, R. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2012, 219 (05) :2432-2441
[4]   Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP [J].
Benitez, J. ;
Delgado-Galvan, X. ;
Gutierrez, J. A. ;
Izquierdo, J. .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2011, 54 (7-8) :1785-1790
[5]  
Brans J., 2016, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P187, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6]
[6]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[7]  
Caflisch R. E., 1998, Acta Numerica, V7, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0962492900002804
[8]   Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: A heuristic approach [J].
Cao, D. ;
Leung, L. C. ;
Law, J. S. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 44 (04) :944-953
[9]   A general unified framework for interval pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Cavallo, Bice ;
Brunelli, Matteo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2018, 93 :178-198
[10]   A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP [J].
Ergu, Daji ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi ;
Shi, Yong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (01) :246-259