Ultra-High-Resolution CT of the Head and Neck with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure and Intraindividual Comparison with Normal-Resolution CT

被引:10
作者
Altmann, Sebastian [1 ]
Mercado, Mario A. Abello A. [1 ]
Ucar, Felix A. [1 ]
Kronfeld, Andrea [1 ]
Al-Nawas, Bilal [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Anirban [3 ]
Booz, Christian [4 ]
Brockmann, Marc A. [1 ]
Othman, Ahmed E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Neuroradiol, Langenbeckst 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Langenbeckst 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Comp Sci, Fraunhoferst 5, D-64283 Darmstadt, Germany
[4] Univ Clin Frankfurt, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
computed tomography; head and neck neoplasms; ultra-high resolution; image quality; radiation dose; deep learning; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; DOSE REDUCTION; ANGIOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13091534
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the benefits of ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT) with deep learning-based image reconstruction engine (AiCE) regarding image quality and radiation dose and intraindividually compare it to normal-resolution CT (NR-CT). Methods: Forty consecutive patients with head and neck UHR-CT with AiCE for diagnosed head and neck malignancies and available prior NR-CT of a different scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Two readers evaluated subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale regarding image noise, image sharpness, artifacts, diagnostic acceptability, and assessability of various anatomic regions. For reproducibility, inter-reader agreement was analyzed. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and slope of the gray-value transition between different tissues were calculated. Radiation dose was evaluated by comparing CTDIvol, DLP, and mean effective dose values. Results: UHR-CT with AiCE reconstruction led to significant improvement in subjective (image noise and diagnostic acceptability: p < 0.000; ICC >= 0.91) and objective image quality (SNR: p < 0.000; CNR: p < 0.025) at significantly lower radiation doses (NR-CT 2.03 +/- 0.14 mSv; UHR-CT 1.45 +/- 0.11 mSv; p < 0.0001) compared to NR-CT. Conclusions: Compared to NR-CT, UHR-CT combined with AiCE provides superior image quality at a markedly lower radiation dose. With improved soft tissue assessment and potentially improved tumor detection, UHR-CT may add further value to the role of CT in the assessment of head and neck pathologies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Determination of perineural invasion preoperatively on radiographic images [J].
Lee, Kimberly J. ;
Abemayor, Elliot ;
Sayre, James ;
Bhuta, Sunita ;
Kirsch, Claudia .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 139 (02) :275-280
[22]   Recent and Upcoming Technological Developments in Computed Tomography High Speed, Low Dose, Deep Learning, Multienergy [J].
Lell, Michael M. ;
Kachelriess, Marc .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2020, 55 (01) :8-19
[23]   Head and neck single- and dual-energy CT: differences in radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT [J].
Lenga, Lukas ;
Lange, Marvin ;
Martin, Simon S. ;
Albrecht, Moritz H. ;
Booz, Christian ;
Yel, Ibrahim ;
Arendt, Christophe T. ;
Vogl, Thomas J. ;
Leithner, Doris .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1122)
[24]   A method to extract image noise level from patient images in CT [J].
Malkus, Annelise ;
Szczykutowicz, Timothy P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) :2173-2184
[25]   Three-dimensional imaging of vocalizing larynx by ultra-high-resolution computed tomography [J].
Miyamoto, Makoto ;
Ohara, Arisa ;
Arai, Takahiro ;
Koyanagi, Masamichi ;
Watanabe, Itaru ;
Nakagawa, Hideki ;
Yokoyama, Kenichi ;
Saito, Koichiro .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (11) :3159-3164
[26]  
Ogawa K, 2021, JPN J RADIOL, V39, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11604-021-01124-6
[27]  
Ong C K, 2010, Cancer Imaging, V10 Spec no A, pS92, DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.9033
[28]   Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner [J].
Oostveen, Luuk J. ;
Boedeker, Kirsten L. ;
Brink, Monique ;
Prokop, Mathias ;
de Lange, Frank ;
Sechopoulos, Ioannis .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) :2552-2560
[29]   Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT [J].
Othman, Ahmed E. ;
Bongers, Malte Niklas ;
Zinsser, Dominik ;
Schabel, Christoph ;
Wichmann, Julian L. ;
Arshid, Rami ;
Notohamiprodjo, Mike ;
Nikolaou, Konstantin ;
Bamberg, Fabian .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (01) :4-12
[30]   Dual-Energy CT in Head and Neck Imaging [J].
Roele E.D. ;
Timmer V.C.M.L. ;
Vaassen L.A.A. ;
van Kroonenburgh A.M.J.L. ;
Postma A.A. .
Current Radiology Reports, 5 (5)