Protected area planning to conserve biodiversity in an uncertain future

被引:11
作者
Schuster, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Buxton, Rachel [1 ]
Hanson, Jeffrey O. O. [1 ]
Binley, Allison D. D. [1 ]
Pittman, Jeremy [3 ]
Tulloch, Vivitskaia [4 ]
La Sorte, Frank A. A. [5 ]
Roehrdanz, Patrick R. R. [6 ]
Verburg, Peter H. H. [7 ]
Rodewald, Amanda D. D. [5 ,8 ]
Wilson, Scott [1 ,9 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. P. [10 ]
Bennett, Joseph R. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Nat Conservancy Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest & Conservat Sci, Conservat Decis Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Cornell Univ, Cornell Lab Ornithol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Ithaca, NY USA
[9] Environm & Climate Change Canada, Wildlife Res Div, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
biodiversity; climate change; governance; land use; optimization; protected areas; risk; LAND-USE; GOVERNANCE; EXPANSION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.14048
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protected areas are a key instrument for conservation. Despite this, they are vulnerable to risks associated with weak governance, land-use intensification, and climate change. We used a novel hierarchical optimization approach to identify priority areas for expanding the global protected area system that explicitly accounted for such risks while maximizing protection of all known terrestrial vertebrate species. To incorporate risk categories, we built on the minimum set problem, where the objective is to reach species distribution protection targets while accounting for 1 constraint, such as land cost or area. We expanded this approach to include multiple objectives accounting for risk in the problem formulation by treating each risk layer as a separate objective in the problem formulation. Reducing exposure to these risks required expanding the area of the global protected area system by 1.6% while still meeting conservation targets. Incorporating risks from weak governance drove the greatest changes in spatial priorities for protection, and incorporating risks from climate change required the largest increase (2.52%) in global protected area. Conserving wide-ranging species required countries with relatively strong governance to protect more land when they bordered nations with comparatively weak governance. Our results underscore the need for cross-jurisdictional coordination and demonstrate how risk can be efficiently incorporated into conservation planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Shifting protected areas: scheduling spatial priorities under climate change
    Alagador, Diogo
    Cerdeira, Jorge Orestes
    Araujo, Miguel Bastos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (03) : 703 - 713
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Aichi biodiversity targets
  • [3] Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size
    Barnes, Megan D.
    Craigie, Ian D.
    Harrison, Luke B.
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Collen, Ben
    Whitmee, Sarah
    Balmford, Andrew
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Brooks, Thomas
    Hockings, Marc
    Woodley, Stephen
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
  • [4] Baynham-Herd Z, 2018, ENVIRON CONSERV, V45, P407, DOI [10.1017/S037689291700056X, 10.1017/s037689291700056x]
  • [5] Global biodiversity conservation priorities
    Brooks, T. M.
    Mittermeier, R. A.
    da Fonseca, G. A. B.
    Gerlach, J.
    Hoffmann, M.
    Lamoreux, J. F.
    Mittermeier, C. G.
    Pilgrim, J. D.
    Rodrigues, A. S. L.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) : 58 - 61
  • [6] Measuring Terrestrial Area of Habitat (AOH) and Its Utility for the IUCN Red List
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Akcakaya, H. Resit
    Buchanan, Graeme M.
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Foden, Wendy
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Jenkins, Clinton N.
    Joppa, Lucas
    Li, Binbin V.
    Menon, Vivek
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    Rondinini, Carlo
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 34 (11) : 977 - 986
  • [7] Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Clarke, Martin
    Smith, Robert J.
    Sykes, Rachel E.
    Scharlemann, Joern P. W.
    Harfoot, Mike
    Buchanan, Graeme M.
    Angulo, Ariadne
    Balmford, Andrew
    Bertzky, Bastian
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Carpenter, Kent E.
    Comeros-Raynal, Mia T.
    Cornell, John
    Ficetola, G. Francesco
    Fishpool, Lincoln D. C.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Harwell, Heather
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Joolia, Ackbar
    Joppa, Lucas
    Kingston, Naomi
    May, Ian
    Milam, Amy
    Polidoro, Beth
    Ralph, Gina
    Richman, Nadia
    Rondinini, Carlo
    Segan, Daniel B.
    Skolnik, Benjamin
    Spalding, Mark D.
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Symes, Andy
    Taylor, Joseph
    Visconti, Piero
    Watson, James E. M.
    Wood, Louisa
    Burgess, Neil D.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2015, 8 (05): : 329 - 337
  • [8] Reviewing Biosphere Reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucratic label?
    Coetzer, Kaera L.
    Witkowski, Edward T. F.
    Erasmus, Barend F. N.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 89 (01) : 82 - 104
  • [9] Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 2020, ZER DRAFT POST 2020
  • [10] Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation
    Dallimer, Martin
    Strange, Niels
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2015, 30 (03) : 132 - 139