Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare

被引:5
作者
Kerasidou, Charalampia [1 ,5 ]
Malone, Maeve [2 ]
Daly, Angela [3 ]
Tava, Francesco [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Dundee Law Sch, Sch Humanities Social Sci & Law, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Univ Dundee, Leverhulme Res Ctr Forens Sci, Sch Sci & Engn, Dundee, Scotland
[4] UWE Bristol, Sch Social Sci, Bristol, England
[5] Univ Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
ethics; ethics-; research; information technology; policy; medical;
D O I
10.1136/jme-2022-108696
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Digitalisation of health and the use of health data in artificial intelligence, and machine learning (ML), including for applications that will then in turn be used in healthcare are major themes permeating current UK and other countries' healthcare systems and policies. Obtaining rich and representative data is key for robust ML development, and UK health data sets are particularly attractive sources for this. However, ensuring that such research and development is in the public interest, produces public benefit and preserves privacy are key challenges. Trusted research environments (TREs) are positioned as a way of balancing the diverging interests in healthcare data research with privacy and public benefit. Using TRE data to train ML models presents various challenges to the balance previously struck between these societal interests, which have hitherto not been discussed in the literature. These challenges include the possibility of personal data being disclosed in ML models, the dynamic nature of ML models and how public benefit may be (re)conceived in this context. For ML research to be facilitated using UK health data, TREs and others involved in the UK health data policy ecosystem need to be aware of these issues and work to address them in order to continue to ensure a 'safe' health and care data environment that truly serves the public.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 843
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Ada Lovelace Institute, 2022, LOOK WE LEAP EXP ETH
[2]  
Ada Lovelace Institute, WE WORK PEOPL
[3]   Trusted research environments are definitely about trust [J].
Affleck, Paul ;
Westaway, Jenny ;
Smith, Maurice ;
Schrecker, Geoff .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 49 (09) :656-657
[4]  
Alliance UHDR NHSX, 2021, Zenodo, DOI [10.5281/ZENODO.5767586, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.5767586]
[5]  
Amberhawk, 2022, HAWTALK
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, National Data Guardian
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Industrial emissions: list of limited lifetime combustion plants in the UK
[8]   NHS data breaches: a further erosion of trust [J].
Banner, Natalie .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 377
[9]   The Social Data Foundation model: Facilitating health and social care transformation through datatrust services [J].
Boniface, Michael ;
Carmichael, Laura ;
Hall, Wendy ;
Pickering, Brian ;
Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie ;
Taylor, Steve .
DATA & POLICY, 2022, 4
[10]   The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble [J].
Carter, Pam ;
Laurie, Graeme T. ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (05) :404-409