Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India

被引:4
作者
Nayak, A. K. [1 ,3 ]
Tripathi, Rahul [1 ]
Dhal, B. [1 ]
Nayak, A. D. [1 ]
Vijayakumar, S. [1 ]
Satpathy, B. [1 ]
Chatterjee, D. [1 ]
Swain, C. K. [1 ]
Moharana, K. C. [1 ]
Nayak, P. K. [1 ]
Poonam, Annie [1 ]
Mohanty, Sangita [1 ]
Shahid, M. [1 ]
Kumar, Anjani [1 ]
Mondal, B. [1 ]
Panda, B. B. [1 ]
Patra, A. K. [2 ]
Swain, S. K. [2 ]
Pathak, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Natl Rice Res Inst, Crop Prod Div, Cuttack, India
[2] Orissa Univ Agr & Technol, Bhubaneswar, India
[3] Natl Rice Res Inst, Crop Prod Div, ICAR, Cuttack 753006, Odisha, India
关键词
Acidification; eco-efficiency; eutrophication; farming system; global warming potential; integrated life cycle analysis; technical efficiency; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; SOIL ACIDIFICATION; NITROGEN-SOURCES; CROPPING SYSTEM; PADDY FIELDS; ENERGY-USE; WATER;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Integrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8-1.2 ha), medium (1.2-2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO(2)eq. ha(-1)) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO(2)eq.ha(-1)). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Carbon footprint of aquaculture in eastern India [J].
Adhikari, Subhendu ;
Lal, Rattan ;
Sahu, Bharat Chandra .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 4 (04) :410-421
[2]  
Ahmadabad H. F., 2013, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, V4, P1603
[3]  
Aigner D.J., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[4]   Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations [J].
Amponsah, Nana Yaw ;
Troldborg, Mads ;
Kington, Bethany ;
Aalders, Inge ;
Hough, Rupert Lloyd .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :461-475
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Agricultural Statistics at a Glance
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, National greenhouse gas inventories: Land use, land use change and forestry
[7]  
Ansari MA, 2014, INDIAN J AGR SCI, V84, P356
[8]  
ASG, 2015, Agricultural statistics at a glance 2014
[9]   Effects of long-term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilizer inputs in Wisconsin [J].
Barak, P ;
Jobe, BO ;
Krueger, AR ;
Peterson, LA ;
Laird, DA .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1997, 197 (01) :61-69
[10]   Energy Budgeting, Data Envelopment Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Emission from Rice Production System: A Case Study from Puddled Transplanted Rice and Direct-Seeded Rice System of Karnataka, India [J].
Basavalingaiah, Kariyaiah ;
Ramesha, Y. M. ;
Paramesh, Venkatesh ;
Rajanna, G. A. ;
Jat, Shankar Lal ;
Dhar Misra, Shiva ;
Kumar Gaddi, Ashok ;
Girisha, H. C. ;
Yogesh, G. S. ;
Raveesha, S. ;
Roopa, T. K. ;
Shashidhar, K. S. ;
Kumar, Bipin ;
El-Ansary, Diaa O. ;
Elansary, Hosam O. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)