Magnetic compression anastomosis for reconstruction of digestive tract after total gastrectomy in beagle model

被引:8
作者
Zhang, Miao-Miao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chen-Guang [3 ]
Xu, Shu-Qin [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Jian-Qi [4 ]
Zhang, Yu-Han [5 ]
Shi, Ai-Hua [2 ]
Li, Yan [2 ]
Lyu, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Xiao-Peng [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Natl Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Precis Surg & Regene, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, China Japan Union Hosp, Changchun 130000, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Zonglian Coll, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Qide Coll, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 277 West Yanta Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic surgery; Magnetic compression anastomosis; Gastric cancer; Total gastrectomy; Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis; Beagles; LEAKAGE; MAGNAMOSIS; SUTURE;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1294
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUNDMagnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a simple procedure contributing to a reliable anastomosis. However, digestive-tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy using MCA has not yet been reported.AIMTo investigate the feasibility of MCA for simultaneous esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy after total gastrectomy using beagle dogs.METHODSSixteen beagles were randomly divided into an MCA group (study group, n = 8) and a manual-suture anastomosis group (control group, n = 8). Two different magnetic anastomosis devices were used in the study group for esophagojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses. Both devices included a pair of circular daughter and parent magnets each. The time of esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy, postoperative complications, and survival rate of the two groups were compared. The dogs were sacrificed one month after the operation and their anastomotic specimens were obtained. Healing was observed by the naked eye and a light microscope.RESULTSDigestive-tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy was successfully completed in both groups (survival rate = 100%). In the study group, esophagojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses took 6.13 & PLUSMN; 0.58 and 4.06 & PLUSMN; 0.42 min, respectively, significantly lower than those in the control group (15.63 & PLUSMN; 1.53 min, P < 0.001 and 10.31 & PLUSMN; 1.07 min, P < 0.001, respectively). Complications such as bleeding, anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic stenosis were not observed. In the study group, the magnets did not interfere with each other. Discharge time of the jejunojejunal magnetic anastomosis device was 10.75 & PLUSMN; 1.28 d, while that of the esophagojejunal magnetic anastomosis device was 12.25 & PLUSMN; 1.49 d. Residual silk was found in the control group. The study group showed a greater smoothness of the anastomosis than that of the control group. All layers of anastomosis healed well in both groups.CONCLUSIONMCA is a safe and feasible procedure for digestive-tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in this animal model.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1303
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) in a porcine esophagus: Proof of concept for potential application in esophageal atresia [J].
Bruns, Nicholas E. ;
Glenn, Ian C. ;
Craner, Domenic R. ;
Schomisch, Steve J. ;
Harrison, Michael R. ;
Ponsky, Todd A. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (03) :429-433
[2]   Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: options of treatment [J].
Carboni, Fabio ;
Valle, Mario ;
Federici, Orietta ;
Sandri, Giovanni Battista Levi ;
Camperchioli, Ida ;
Lapenta, Rocco ;
Assisi, Daniela ;
Garofalo, Alfredo .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 7 (04) :515-522
[3]   Identification of Risk Factors for Esophagojejunal Anastomotic Leakage after Gastric Surgery [J].
Deguchi, Yasunori ;
Fukagawa, Takeo ;
Morita, Shinji ;
Ohashi, Masaki ;
Saka, Makoto ;
Katai, Hitoshi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (07) :1617-1622
[4]  
El-Sourani N, 2017, POL J RADIOL, V82, P170, DOI 10.12659/PJR.899951
[5]  
Fan Chao, 2011, Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, V26, P182
[6]   Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques [J].
Jamshidi, Ramin ;
Stephenson, Jacob T. ;
Clay, Jared G. ;
Pichakron, Kullada O. ;
Harrison, Michael R. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (01) :222-228
[7]   Magnetic compression anastomosis with atypical anastomosis for anastomotic stenosis of the sigmoid colon: a case report [J].
Kamada, Teppei ;
Ohdaira, Hironori ;
Hoshimoto, Sojun ;
Narihiro, Satoshi ;
Suzuki, Norihiko ;
Marukuchi, Rui ;
Takeuchi, Hideyuki ;
Yoshida, Masashi ;
Yamanouchi, Eigoro ;
Suzuki, Yutaka .
SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 6 (01)
[8]  
Kawabata Hideaki, 2021, J Clin Transl Res, V7, P621
[9]   Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Makuuchi, Rie ;
Irino, Tomoyuki ;
Tanizawa, Yutaka ;
Bando, Etsuro ;
Kawamura, Taiichi ;
Terashima, Masanori .
SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (03) :187-196
[10]   Risk Factors for Esophagojejunal Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer [J].
Migita, Kazuhiro ;
Takayama, Tomoyoshi ;
Matsumoto, Sohei ;
Wakatsuki, Kohei ;
Enomoto, Koji ;
Tanaka, Tetsuya ;
Ito, Masahiro ;
Nakajima, Yoshiyuki .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (09) :1659-1665