Facilitators of and Barriers to Accessing Hospital Medical Specialty Telemedicine Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review

被引:18
作者
Cunha, Ana Soraia [1 ,4 ]
Pedro, Ana Rita [2 ]
Cordeiro, Joao, V [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ NOVA Lisboa, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, NOVA Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] NOVA Univ Lisbon, Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, NOVA Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] NOVA Univ Lisbon, Interdisciplinary Ctr Social Sci, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ NOVA Lisboa, NOVA Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Ave Padre Cruz, P-1600560 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
health services accessibility; COVID-19; hospitals; barriers; facilitators; telemedicine; ACADEMIC INSTITUTION; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; TELEHEALTH; TECHNOLOGY; HOME; REHABILITATION; NEUROSURGERY; PERCEPTIONS; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.2196/44188
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the digital transition in health care, which required a rapid adaptation for stakeholders. Telemedicine has emerged as an ideal tool to ensure continuity of care by allowing remote access to specialized medical services. However, its rapid implementation has exacerbated disparities in health care access, especially for the most susceptible populations.Objective: We aimed to characterize the determinant factors (facilitators and barriers) of access to hospital medical specialty telemedicine consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify the main opportunities and challenges (technological, ethical, legal, and social) generated by the use of telemedicine in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 4 databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) were searched for empirical studies published between January 3, 2020, and December 31, 2021, using established criteria. The protocol of this review was registered and published in PROSPERO (CRD42022302825). A methodological quality assessment was performed, and the results were integrated into a thematic synthesis. The identification of the main opportunities and challenges was done by interpreting and aggregating the thematic synthesis results.Results: Of the 106 studies identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria and the intended quality characteristics. All studies were originally from the United States. The following facilitating factors of telemedicine use were identified: health insurance coverage; prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection; access to internet services; access to technological devices; better management of work-life balance; and savings in travel costs. We identified the following barriers to telemedicine use: lack of access to internet services; lack of access to technological devices; racial and ethnic disparities; low digital literacy; low income; age; language barriers; health insurance coverage; concerns about data privacy and confidentiality; geographic disparities; and the need for complementary diagnostic tests or the delivery of test results.Conclusions: The facilitating factors and barriers identified in this systematic review present different opportunities and challenges, including those of a technological nature (access to technological devices and internet services and level of digital literacy), a sociocultural and demographic nature (ethnic and racial disparities, geographic disparities, language barriers, and age), a socioeconomic nature (income level and health insurance coverage), and an ethical and legal nature (data privacy and confidentiality). To expand telemedicine access to hospital-based specialty medical consultations and provide high-quality care to all, including the most susceptible communities, the challenges identified must be thoroughly researched and addressed with informed and dedicated responses.(J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e44188) doi: 10.2196/44188
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   Disparities in Access to Pediatric Otolaryngology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Adigwu, Yvonne ;
Osterbauer, Beth ;
Hochstim, Christian .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 131 (09) :971-978
[2]  
Alboksmaty Ahmed, 2022, Lancet Digit Health, V4, pe279, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00276-4
[3]   Telehealth use in cystic fibrosis during COVID-19: Association with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors [J].
Albon, Dana ;
Van Citters, Aricca D. ;
Ong, Thida ;
Dieni, Olivia ;
Dowd, Christopher ;
Willis, Anne ;
Sabadosa, Kathryn A. ;
Scalia, Peter ;
Reno, Kimberly ;
Oates, Gabriela R. ;
Schechter, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2021, 20 :S49-S54
[4]   Barriers and Facilitators That Influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at Patients' Homes: Systematic Literature Review [J].
Almathami, Hassan Khader Y. ;
Win, Khin Than ;
Vlahu-Gjorgievska, Elena .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (02)
[5]   Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID-19 and beyond [J].
Annaswamy, Thiru M. ;
Verduzco-Gutierrez, Monica ;
Frieden, Lex .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (04)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan: Operational Planning Guideline: 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2022
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MAINT ESS HLTH SERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], NY Times
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, LOOK BACK YEAR CHANG
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PROT PERS DAT HLTH