Incorporating Psychological Science Into Policy Making The Case of Misinformation

被引:6
|
作者
Kozyreva, Anastasia [1 ,6 ]
Smillie, Laura [2 ]
Lewandowsky, Stephan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Rat, Berlin, Germany
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol Sci, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, Crawley, Australia
[5] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, Potsdam, Germany
[6] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Adapt Rat, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
misinformation; disinformation; harmful content; regulation; policy making; SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY; FALSE NEWS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1027/1016-9040/a000493
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The spread of false and misleading information in online social networks is a global problem in need of urgent solutions. It is also a policy problem because misinformation can harm both the public and democracies. To address the spread of misinformation, policymakers require a successful interface between science and policy, as well as a range of evidence-based solutions that respect fundamental rights while efficiently mitigating the harms of misinformation online. In this article, we discuss how regulatory and nonregulatory instruments can be informed by scientific research and used to reach EU policy objectives. First, we consider what it means to approach misinformation as a policy problem. We then outline four building blocks for cooperation between scientists and policymakers who wish to address the problem of misinformation: understanding the misinformation problem, understanding the psychological drivers and public perceptions of misinformation, finding evidence-based solutions, and co-developing appropriate policy measures. Finally, through the lens of psychological science, we examine policy instruments that have been proposed in the EU, focusing on the strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation 2022.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 224
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological Underpinnings of Misinformation Countermeasures
    Ziemer, Carolin-Theresa
    Rothmund, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 36 (06) : 397 - 409
  • [2] Misinformation in and about science
    West, Jevin D.
    Bergstrom, Carl T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (15)
  • [3] Combating misinformation online: re-imagining social media for policy-making
    Kyza, Eleni A.
    Varda, Christiana
    Panos, Dionysis
    Karageorgiou, Melina
    Komendantova, Nadejda
    Perfumi, Serena Coppolino
    Shah, Syed Iftikhar Husain
    Hosseini, Akram Sadat
    INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2020, 9 (04): : 1 - 24
  • [4] Development and case study of a science-based software platform to support policy making on air quality
    Zhu, Yun
    Lao, Yanwen
    Jang, Carey
    Lin, Chen-Jen
    Xing, Jia
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Fu, Joshua S.
    Deng, Shuang
    Xie, Junping
    Long, Shicheng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2015, 27 : 97 - 107
  • [5] Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis
    Allchin, Douglas
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2023, 107 (02) : 261 - 274
  • [6] Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    Krause, Nicole M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (16) : 7662 - 7669
  • [7] Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation
    Holmes, John
    Clark, Rebecca
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (08) : 702 - 711
  • [9] Fighting Misinformation with Social Media Reporting: A Psychological Perspective
    Lin, Yao-San
    Chen, Hung -Yu
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2024, 36 (05) : 1933 - 1949
  • [10] Policy-making in science policy: The 'OECD model' unveiled
    Henriques, Luisa
    Laredo, Philippe
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (03) : 801 - 816