Coseismic and early postseismic deformation of the 2020 Nima Mw 6.4 earthquake, central Tibet, from InSAR and GNSS observations

被引:1
作者
Liu, Xiaoli [1 ]
Xia, Tao [1 ]
Liu-Zeng, Jing [2 ]
Deng, Debeier [1 ]
Jia, Zhige [1 ]
Wang, Peng [3 ]
Yu, Pengfei [1 ]
Wang, Wenqing [4 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Seismol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Monitoring & Applicat Ctr China Earthquake Adm, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
normal faulting earthquake; 2020 Nima earthquake; InSAR; GNSS; coseismic deformation; postseismic deformation; Tibetan plateau; FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS; SURFACE DEFORMATION; ACTIVE TECTONICS; PLATEAU; SHEAR; MECHANICS; EXTENSION; INVERSION; INSIGHT; RATES;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2022.1012773
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The 2020 Mw6.4 Nima earthquake is one of the largest normal-faulting earthquakes recently occurring north of the Banggong suture zone in remote central Tibet, where geologic investigation of active faults is extremely limited. We analyze jointly InSAR and GNSS observations over 9 months after the Nima earthquake and calculate the coseismic and postseismic displacement. The optimal coseismic slip model suggests this event is the result of moderate-angle down-dip slip on a complex reversed "S-shape " three-segmented structure at fault junctions of the West Yibu-Chaka fault, the Heishi fault, and an unmapped blind fault, with a small component of left-lateral slip. The superposition of seismic waves from faults with different strikes and dips accounted for a large non-double-couple component in the long-period point-source solutions. The geodetic moment released by the mainshock is 6.4 x 10(18) N.m, equivalent to Mw 6.42. Coseismic rupture concentrated at a depth of 4-15 km, with a peak slip of 1.36 m at 8.5 km depth. The cumulative afterslip moment within 9 months after the mainshock is 1 x 10(18) N m, about 15.6% of that released by the mainshock coseismic slip. The afterslips contributed largely to the release of additional strain energy. In addition, shallow creep on the northern part of the blind fault, and deep uplift on the east normal fault system are promoted by stress perturbations. A significant proportion of down-dip coseismic slip spreading to more than 20 km beneath the surface, and deep up-slip afterslip have implications for the rheology of down-dip extension of the dipping faults in northern Tibet. Two obvious stress loading zones of more than 1 bar highlight seismic hazards in the region, especially in the junction between normal faults and ends of the large-size sinistral Riganpei-Co and Jiangai-Zangbu faults. It is necessary to forecast accurately by longer-term afterslip observation over timescales of years for the faults. Compared with previous studies, our results suggest a more complex subsurface fault geometry linking the normal and strike-slip faults and dynamic stress adjustment in this poorly-known region of Tibet.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Ground Deformation and Seismic Fault Model of the M6.4 Durres (Albania) Nov. 26, 2019 Earthquake, Based on GNSS/INSAR Observations [J].
Ganas, Athanassios ;
Elias, Panagiotis ;
Briole, Pierre ;
Cannavo, Flavio ;
Valkaniotis, Sotirios ;
Tsironi, Varvara ;
Partheniou, Eleni, I .
GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 10 (06) :1-16
[32]   Coseismic Deformation and Slip Distribution of 2021 Mw 7.4 Madoi Earthquake from GNSS Observation [J].
Li Z. ;
Ding K. ;
Zhang P. ;
Wen Y. ;
Zhao L. ;
Chen J. .
Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2021, 46 (10) :1489-1497
[33]   Coseismic displacement and slip distribution of the 2021 May 21, Ms6.4, Yangbi Earthquake derived from GNSS observations [J].
Zhang KeLiang ;
Gan WeiJun ;
Liang ShiMing ;
Xiao GenRu ;
Dai ChengLong ;
Wang YueBing ;
Li ZhangJun ;
Zhang Ling ;
Ma GuangQing .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2021, 64 (07) :2253-2266
[34]   Ground Deformation Modelling of the 2020 Mw6.9 Samos Earthquake (Greece) Based on InSAR and GNSS Data [J].
Sakkas, Vassilis .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (09)
[35]   Lithospheric rheology in West Tibet and Pamir constrained from the postseismic deformation of the 2005 Mw7.6 Kashmir (Pakistan) earthquake [J].
Chen, Yunguo ;
Li, Jingwei ;
Wang, Qi ;
Fang, Zhiwei .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2024, 645
[36]   Coseismic Slip from the 6 October 2008, Mw6.3 Damxung Earthquake, Tibetan Plateau, Constrained by InSAR Observations [J].
Xuejun Qiao ;
Shaomin Yang ;
Ruilin Du ;
Linlin Ge ;
Qi Wang .
Pure and Applied Geophysics , 2011, 168 :1749-1758
[37]   Rheological structure of lithosphere in northern Tibet inferred from postseismic deformation modeling of the 2001 Mw 7. 8 Kokoxili earthquake [J].
He PengChao ;
Wang Min ;
Wang Qi ;
Shen ZhengKang .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2018, 61 (02) :531-544
[38]   Coseismic deformation of the 2021 Mw7.4 Maduo earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR, GPS, and teleseismic data [J].
Liu, Chaoya ;
Bai, Ling ;
Hong, Shunying ;
Dong, Yanfang ;
Jiang, Yong ;
Li, Hongru ;
Zhan, Huili ;
Chen, Zhiwen .
EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (05) :436-446
[39]   Time-Dependent Afterslip of the 2009 Mw 6.3 Dachaidan Earthquake (China) and Viscosity beneath the Qaidam Basin Inferred from Postseismic Deformation Observations [J].
Liu, Yang ;
Xu, Caijun ;
Li, Zhenhong ;
Wen, Yangmao ;
Chen, Jiajun ;
Li, Zhicai .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (08)
[40]   Coseismic surface deformation and fault model of the 27 May 2017 Mw 5.2 Saruhanli-Manisa (western Turkey) earthquake from InSAR [J].
Akoglu, Ahmet M. .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 29 (03) :538-549