Application of an automated grid deformation tool for divertor shape optimization in SOLPS-ITER

被引:0
作者
Van den Kerkhof, Sander [1 ,2 ]
Vervloesem, Nathan [1 ]
Carli, Stefano [1 ]
Dekeyser, Wouter [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Mech Engn Thermal & Fluids Engn, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Dept Mech Engn, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300C, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
CARRE2; grid deformation; shape optimization; SOLPS-ITER;
D O I
10.1002/ctpp.202300134
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
An optimized divertor design is crucial to maximize the lifetime of plasma-facing components and reduce costs of future fusion power plants. Numerical shape optimization could be a powerful tool to obtain improved designs in an automated way. However, it is not trivial to apply due to the need of a field-aligned and boundary-fitted grid for simulating the plasma and quantifying the heat load. This paper shows how a grid deformation tool can automate the gridding process while safeguarding the grid quality. Additionally, sensitivities of shape parameters are computed using finite differences and compared to those obtained by remeshing using standard tools such as CARRE2. The plasma and neutral behavior is simulated using the unstructured SOLPS-ITER code with the latest advanced fluid neutrals model for an ASDEX Upgrade test case. The comparison shows that, contrary to the remeshing strategy, the grid deformation approach yields smoother sensitivities. Furthermore, it is shown that the deformed grids have better mesh quality in terms of poloidal cell size ratio compared to the grid generated with CARRE2, which improves the accuracy of the simulation. This supports the use of the grid deformation tool for automated shape design in future work.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Blommaert M., 2017, AUTOMATED MAGNETIC D
[2]  
Carli S., 2022, CONTRIB PLASM PHYS, V62, P1
[3]   Algorithmic Differentiation for adjoint sensitivity calculation in plasma edge codes [J].
Carli, Stefano ;
Hascoet, Laurent ;
Dekeyser, Wouter ;
Blommaert, Maarten .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2023, 491
[4]   Plasma edge simulations including realistic wall geometry with SOLPS-ITER [J].
Dekeyser, W. ;
Boerner, P. ;
Voskoboynikov, S. ;
Rozhanksy, V. A. ;
Senichenkov, I. ;
Kaveeva, L. ;
Veselova, I. ;
Vekshina, E. ;
Bonnin, X. ;
Pitts, R. A. ;
Baelmans, M. .
NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY, 2021, 27
[5]   Divertor Design through Shape Optimization [J].
Dekeyser, W. ;
Reiter, D. ;
Baelmans, M. .
CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS, 2012, 52 (5-6) :544-549
[6]  
Donne A.J.H., 2018, European research roadmap to the realisation of fusion energy
[7]   Development and assessment of 2D fluid neutral models that include atomic databases and a microscopic reflection model [J].
Horsten, N. ;
Samaey, G. ;
Baelmans, M. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2017, 57 (11)
[8]   Advanced spatial discretizations in the B2.5 plasma fluid code [J].
Klingshirn, H. -J. ;
Coster, D. P. ;
Bonnin, X. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2013, 438 :S856-S860
[9]   CARRE: A quasi-orthogonal mesh generator for 2D edge plasma modelling [J].
Marchand, R ;
Dumberry, M .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, 96 (2-3) :232-246
[10]  
Nocedal J, 2006, SPRINGER SER OPER RE, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5