Computation of energy across the type-C piano key weir using gene expression programming and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm

被引:16
作者
Bansal, Nipun [1 ]
Singh, Deepak [2 ]
Kumar, Munendra [2 ]
机构
[1] Delhi Technol Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Delhi 110042, India
[2] Delhi Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Delhi 110042, India
关键词
Residual energy prediction; Gene expression programming; Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost); Piano key weir;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.003
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
An accurate assessment of energy loss across dams and weir systems is a critical technical and monetary remedy for understanding the hydraulic system's downstream morphology during the flood. Using the standard empirical formulas, accurately estimating the energy loss across the different hydraulic devices is a tedious and challenging procedure. Consequently, new and concise techniques remain highly sought after. This paper presents two empirical models based on the Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) techniques to examine energy losses throughout the type-C PKW. The empirical models have been developed to consider five non-dimensional parameters, viz L/W, H-t /P, W-i/W-o, N, and S-i /S-o, that influence the energy over the weir significantly. The models were created using experimental data from a wide range of residual energy losses and release capacities. Additionally, the adequacy of the constructed GEP and XGBoost models was assessed using the RMSE (root mean square error) and statistical variables coefficient (R-2). As per the outcomes, the XGBoost model beats the GEP with the determination coefficient (R-2) = 0.999, MAE = 0.0062, MAPE = 1.4% and RMSE = 0.0012 in the training stage and R-2 = 0.998, MAE = 0.001, MAPE = 2.1, and RMSE = 0.001 in the testing data. These findings show that the XGBoost algorithm is more accurate than the two algorithms in this study for downstream energy prediction of type-C PKW. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under theCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 321
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A review of Piano Key Weir as a superior alternative for dam rehabilitation [J].
Abhash A. ;
Pandey K.K. .
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 28 (S1) :541-551
[2]  
Al-Shukur Abdul-Hassan K., 2018, International Journal of Energy and Environment (IJEE), V9, P63
[3]  
Amin MR, 2019, Energy loss below rectangular sharp-crested weirs for free flows, P2539
[4]   Piano Key Weir Hydraulics and Labyrinth Weir Comparison [J].
Anderson, R. M. ;
Tullis, B. P. .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (03) :246-253
[5]   Gene expression programming and artificial neural network to estimate atmospheric temperature in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia [J].
Azamathulla, H. Md. ;
Rathnayake, Upaka ;
Shatnawi, Ahmad .
APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (06)
[6]   An expert system for predicting Manning's roughness coefficient in open channels by using gene expression programming [J].
Azamathulla, H. Md ;
Ahmad, Z. ;
Ab Ghani, Aminuddin .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2013, 23 (05) :1343-1349
[7]  
Bhukya RK, 2022, Water, P1
[8]  
Bieri M, 2011, LABYRINTH AND PIANO KEY WEIRS - PKW 2011, P123
[9]   Predictive modelling of the stage-discharge relationship using Gene-Expression Programming [J].
Birbal, Prashant ;
Azamathulla, Hazi ;
Leon, Lee ;
Kumar, Vikram ;
Hosein, Jerome .
WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (07) :3503-3514
[10]  
Chemaly AG, 2017, P ANN SANCOLD C 2017, P271