Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals

被引:1
作者
Saeb, Samia [1 ]
Korst, Lisa M. [2 ]
Fridman, Moshe [2 ]
McCulloch, Jeanette [3 ]
Greene, Naomi [1 ]
Gregory, Kimberly D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Maternal Met Inc, North Hollywood, CA USA
[3] BirthSwell, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Childbirth experiences; Implementation science; Clinical informatics; PRO data collection; Case study; Learning collaborative; Patient satisfaction; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-023-03720-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PurposePatient-reported outcomes and experiences (PRO) data are an integral component of health care quality measurement and PROs are now being collected by many healthcare systems. However, hospital organizational capacity-building for the collection and sharing of PROs is a complex process. We sought to identify the factors that facilitated capacity-building for PRO data collection in a nascent quality improvement learning collaborative of 16 hospitals that has the goal of improving the childbirth experience.DescriptionWe used standard qualitative case study methodologies based on a conceptual framework that hypothesizes that adequate organizational incentives and capacities allow successful achievement of project milestones in a collaborative setting. The 4 project milestones considered in this study were: (1) Agreements; (2) System Design; (3) System Development and Operations; and (4) Implementation. To evaluate the success of reaching each milestone, critical incidents were logged and tracked to determine the capacities and incentives needed to resolve them.AssessmentThe pace of the implementation of PRO data collection through the 4 milestones was uneven across hospitals and largely dependent on limited hospital capacities in the following 8 dimensions: (1) Incentives; (2) Leadership; (3) Policies; (4) Operating systems; (5) Information technology; (6) Legal aspects; (7) Cross-hospital collaboration; and (8) Patient engagement. From this case study, a trajectory for capacity-building in each dimension is discussed.ConclusionThe implementation of PRO data collection in a quality improvement learning collaborative was dependent on multiple organizational capacities for the achievement of project milestones. SignificancePatient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) are measures of a patient's health status. PROs are self-reported and do not require interpretation by the provider. PROs are being collected by many healthcare systems as a patient-centered approach to measuring and reporting healthcare quality. This case study outlines the critical issues involved in collecting PRO data and identifies the factors that facilitate capacity-building for PRO data collection. It provides an example of how the PRO data could be applied to improve patient satisfaction with the childbirth hospital experience.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1471
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A roadmap to operationalize and evaluate impact in a learning health system
    Allen, Claire
    Coleman, Katie
    Mettert, Kayne
    Lewis, Cara
    Westbrook, Emily
    Lozano, Paula
    [J]. LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2021, 5 (04):
  • [2] Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative
    Auffenberg, Gregory B.
    Qi, Ji
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    Linsell, Susan
    Kim, Tae
    Miller, David C.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey
    Sarle, Richard
    Johnston, William K., III
    Kleer, Eduardo
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Montie, James
    Peabody, James
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (03)
  • [3] Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    Merkel, Peter A.
    Mielenz, Thelma J.
    Pilkonis, Paul A.
    Edmundson, Lauren
    Moore, Emily
    Sabharwal, Rajeev K.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 2109 - 2116
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies
    Black, N.
    Burke, L.
    Forrest, C. B.
    Sieberer, U. H. Ravens
    Ahmed, S.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Bartlett, S. J.
    Alonso, J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) : 1103 - 1112
  • [5] Breen W., 2021, Patient Experience Journal, V8, P69, DOI DOI 10.35680/2372-0247.1508
  • [6] Cella D, 2015, PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT, P1, DOI 10.3768/rtipress.2015.bk.0014.1509
  • [7] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [8] Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research
    Finkelstein, Jonathan A.
    Brickman, Andrew L.
    Capron, Alexander
    Ford, Daniel E.
    Gombosev, Adrijana
    Greene, Sarah M.
    Iafrate, R. Peter
    Kolaczkowski, Laura
    Pallin, Sarah C.
    Pletcher, Mark J.
    Staman, Karen L.
    Vazquez, Miguel A.
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (05) : 457 - 466
  • [9] Networked health care: Rethinking value creation in learning health care systems
    Fjeldstad, Oystein D.
    Johnson, Julie K.
    Margolis, Peter A.
    Seid, Michael
    Hoeglund, Paer
    Batalden, Paul B.
    [J]. LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 4 (02):
  • [10] Foley TJ, 2017, LEARN HEALTH SYST, V1, DOI 10.1002/lrh2.10025