How does trade policy uncertainty affect China?s economy and energy?

被引:29
作者
Wang, Feng [1 ]
Wu, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade policy uncertainty; Trade restrictions; Shocks assessing; Economy; Energy; OIL PRICE SHOCKS; CONSUMPTION; GROWTH; IMPACT; RESTRICTIONS; CAUSALITY; DECADES; BREXIT; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117198
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Facing increasing trade policy uncertainty, deeply understanding the impacts of trade policy shocks on the economy and energy is of vital realistic importance for China to respond to these shocks, strengthen economic resilience, and promote high-quality development. This study develops an integrating input-output model with economy and energy, and evaluates the extreme effects of trade policy uncertainty on the macro-economy, in-dustry development, and energy consumption in China, based on bottom-line thinking. The results are shown as follows. Firstly, under extreme scenarios, trade restriction policies would harm China's economy with a maximum GDP decline of 5.65%. However, China's countermeasures against trade restrictions could reduce economic losses by an average of 2.07%. Secondly, the industries would be hit by trade policy uncertainty in varying degrees. Trade policy uncertainty would strike the textile and apparel industry, machinery industry and other manufacturing 7.64% greater than other industries on average. Thirdly, under extreme scenarios, trade restriction policies would decrease China's energy consumption with a maximum drop of 6.91%; China's countermeasures against this could raise energy consumption by an average of 2.46%. Fourth, the fossil energy consumption reduced by trade policy uncertainty would be 3.95% more than the non-fossil energy consumption on average.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The impacts of oil price shocks in Turkey: sectoral evidence from the FAVAR approach [J].
Akkoc, Ugur ;
Akcaglayan, Anil ;
Kargin Akkoc, Gamze .
ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2021, 54 (04) :1147-1171
[2]  
Ali Bekhet H., 2014, INT EC, V140, P49, DOI [10.1016/j.inteco.2014.07.003, DOI 10.1016/J.INTECO.2014.07.003]
[3]   Clean energy development in the United States amidst augmented socioeconomic aspects and country-specific policies [J].
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Saint Akadiri, Seyi .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 169 :221-230
[4]   Economic impact of oil price shocks on the Turkish economy in the coming decades: A dynamic CGE analysis [J].
Aydin, Levent ;
Acar, Mustafa .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) :1722-1731
[5]   Trade policy shocks in the UK textile and apparel value chain: Firm perceptions of Brexit uncertainty [J].
Casadei, Patrizia ;
Iammarino, Simona .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS POLICY, 2021, 4 (02) :262-285
[6]   Macroeconomic fluctuations in the Eastern Caribbean: The role of climatic and external shocks [J].
Cashin, Paul ;
Sosa, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 22 (05) :729-748
[7]  
Chen D., 2020, EC RES J, V12, P98
[8]  
Davis StevenJ., 2019, Economic Policy Uncertainty in China Since 1949: The View from Mainland Newspapers
[9]  
Dixon PB, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
[10]   China-US trade dispute and its impact on global agricultural markets, the US economy, and greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Elobeid, Amani ;
Carriquiry, Miguel ;
Dumortier, Jerome ;
Swenson, David ;
Hayes, Dermot .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 72 (03) :647-672