The biopsychosociotechnical model: a systems-based framework for human-centered health improvement

被引:14
作者
Card, Alan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Biopsychosocial; sociotechnical; models; theoretical; holistic health; systems theory; ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; PATIENT SAFETY; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; BLOOD-PRESSURE; UNITED-STATES; CARE; SCIENCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/20476965.2022.2029584
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The biopsychosocial model is among the most influential frameworks for human-centered health improvement but has faced significant criticism- both conceptual and pragmatic. This paper extends and fundamentally re-structures the biopsychosocial model by combining it with sociotechnical systems theory. The resulting biopsychosociotechnical model addresses key critiques of the biopsychosocial model, providing a more "practical theory" for human-centered health improvement. It depicts the determinants of health as complex adaptive system of systems; includes the the artificial world (technology); and provides a roadmap for systems improvement by: differentiating between "health status" and "health and needs assessment", [promoting problem framing]; explaining health as an emergent property of the biopsychosociotechnical context [imposing a systems orientation]; focusing on "interventions" vs. "treatments" to modify the biopsychosociotechnical determinants of health, [expanding the solution space]; calling for a participatory design process [supporting systems awareness and goal-orientation]; and including intervention management to support the full lifecycle of health improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 407
页数:21
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [11] The Current State of Physical Therapy Pain Curricula in the United States: A Faculty Survey
    Bement, Marie K. Hoeger
    Sluka, Kathleen A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (02) : 144 - 152
  • [12] Biopsychosocial approach to understanding resilience: Stress habituation and where to intervene
    Bennett, Jeanette M.
    Rohleder, Nicolas
    Sturmberg, Joachim P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (06) : 1339 - 1346
  • [13] Defining health by addressing individual, social, and environmental determinants: New opportunities for health care and public health
    Bircher, Johannes
    Kuruvilla, Shyama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 35 (03) : 363 - 386
  • [14] Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies
    Black, N.
    Burke, L.
    Forrest, C. B.
    Sieberer, U. H. Ravens
    Ahmed, S.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Bartlett, S. J.
    Alonso, J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) : 1103 - 1112
  • [15] The biopsychosocial model 25 years later:: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry
    Borrell-Carrió, F
    Suchman, AL
    Epstein, RM
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (06) : 576 - 582
  • [16] Doctors as a knowledge and intelligence building group: pragmatic principles underlying decision-making processes
    Borrell-Carrio, Francisco
    Estany, Anna
    Platt, Frederic W.
    MoralesHidalgo, Vicente
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2015, 69 (04) : 303 - 305
  • [17] Boullier M., 2018, PAED CHILD HEALT-CAN, V28, P132, DOI [10.1016/j.paed.2017.12.008, DOI 10.1016/J.PAED.2017.12.008]
  • [18] Embedding OR modelling as decision support in health capacity planning: insights from an evaluation
    Brailsford, Sally
    Bayer, Steffen
    Connell, Con
    George, Abraham
    Klein, Jonathan
    Lacey, Peter
    [J]. HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2023, 12 (01) : 22 - 35
  • [19] Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems
    Braithwaite, J.
    Runciman, W. B.
    Merry, A. F.
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (01): : 37 - 41
  • [20] Braithwaite J., 2021, Textbook of patient safety and clinical risk management, P375, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59403-9_27