Can co-production enhance professional public service provision? evidence from vocational training programme for people with disabilities in China

被引:1
作者
Wang, Daan [1 ]
Li, Wei [2 ,5 ]
Zhang, Yi [3 ]
Parrado, Salvador [4 ]
Ni, Tianran [3 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Integr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Publ Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Dept Publ Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Distance Educ Univ Spain, UNED, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Madrid, Spain
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Publ Adm, 1037 Luoyu Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Co-production; professional public service; vocational training; employment for People with disabilities; HYBRID PROFESSIONALISM; BETA REGRESSION; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; PERFORMANCE; DELIVERY; USER;
D O I
10.1080/17516234.2024.2325855
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Recent research on professional services has sought to pay nuanced attention to the relationship between professionalism and public service performance. At the same time, existing literature has examined the role of co-production in local public service delivery but has primarily remained theoretical and qualitative, calling for more empirical testing. Bridging these two different streams of literature, this article is the first to investigate how co-production affects the performance of China's vocational training service for disabled persons. Using cross-sectional data from the 2018 national survey conducted by the China Disabled Persons' Federation, our research shows that training institutions adopting a co-production approach are more likely to achieve higher employment rates (self-reported) among their trainees. Furthermore, multiple measures of professionalism are found to be positively associated with the employment outcomes of vocational training programmes. Implications for future research on professionalism and co-production in public service delivery are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Aakvik A., 2003, EMPIR ECON, V28, P515, DOI DOI 10.1007/S001810200143
[2]  
Alford J., 2012, Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-00724-7
[3]   Too Vulnerable to Involve? Challenges of Engaging Vulnerable Groups in the Co-production of Public Services through Research [J].
Amann, Julia ;
Sleigh, Joanna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 44 (09) :715-727
[4]  
Anderson Stuart., 2013, INT J PUBLIC PRIVATE, V3, P44, DOI [10.4018/ijpphme.2013070104, DOI 10.4018/IJPPHME.2013070104]
[5]   Dimensions of Publicness and Organizational Performance: A Review of the Evidence [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Boyne, George A. ;
Walker, Richard M. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2011, 21 :I301-I319
[6]   Publicness in times of market accountability: Lessons from a changing hospital industry in Germany [J].
Bode, Ingo .
PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 34 (01) :3-21
[7]   Employment opportunities for persons with different types of disability [J].
Boman, Tomas ;
Kjellberg, Anders ;
Danermark, Berth ;
Boman, Eva .
ALTER-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (02) :116-129
[8]  
Bovaird T., 2013, New public governance, the third sector, and Co-production, P60
[9]   Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services [J].
Bovaird, Tony .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (05) :846-860
[10]  
Bozeman B., 1994, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A037204, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037204]