Interdependence of "What" and "When" in the Brain

被引:5
作者
Ten Oever, Sanne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martin, Andrea E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
VOICE ONSET TIME; NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; CORTICAL TRACKING; PERCEPTION; SPEECH; PHASE; MECHANISM; REPRESENTATIONS; RECALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_02067
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
From a brain's-eye-view, when a stimulus occurs and what it is are interrelated aspects of interpreting the perceptual world. Yet in practice, the putative perceptual inferences about sensory content and timing are often dichotomized and not investigated as an integrated process. We here argue that neural temporal dynamics can influence what is perceived, and in turn, stimulus content can influence the time at which perception is achieved. This computational principle results from the highly interdependent relationship of what and when in the environment. Both brain processes and perceptual events display strong temporal variability that is not always modeled; we argue that understanding-and, minimally, modeling-this temporal variability is key for theories of how the brain generates unified and consistent neural representations and that we ignore temporal variability in our analysis practice at the peril of both data interpretation and theory-building. Here, we review what and when interactions in the brain, demonstrate via simulations how temporal variability can result in misguided interpretations and conclusions, and outline how to integrate and synthesize what and when in theories and models of brain computation.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 186
页数:20
相关论文
共 167 条
  • [1] Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
    Alvarez, George A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (03) : 122 - 131
  • [2] Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When " Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms
    Auksztulewicz, Ryszard
    Schwiedrzik, Caspar M.
    Thesen, Thomas
    Doyle, Werner
    Devinsky, Orrin
    Nobre, Anna C.
    Schroeder, Charles E.
    Friston, Karl J.
    Melloni, Lucia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (40) : 8680 - 8693
  • [3] Ballard DH, 2015, COMPUT NEUROSCI-MIT, P1, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028615.001.0001
  • [4] Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding
    Bastos, Andre M.
    Usrey, W. Martin
    Adams, Rick A.
    Mangun, George R.
    Fries, Pascal
    Friston, Karl J.
    [J]. NEURON, 2012, 76 (04) : 695 - 711
  • [5] Distributed synaptic modification in neural networks induced by patterned stimulation
    Bi, GQ
    Poo, MM
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 401 (6755) : 792 - 796
  • [6] The processing of melodic and temporal information: Independent or unified dimensions?
    Boltz, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEW MUSIC RESEARCH, 1999, 28 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [7] How Our Own Speech Rate Influences Our Perception of Others
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (08) : 1225 - 1238
  • [8] Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (01) : 333 - 343
  • [9] Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc
    Brisson, Benoit
    Robitaille, Nicolas
    Jolicceur, Pierre
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (15) : 1627 - 1630
  • [10] Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech
    Brodbeck, Christian
    Hong, L. Elliot
    Simon, Jonathan Z.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (24) : 3976 - +