Ara h 2 Peptide Mix Improves the Diagnosis of Peanut Allergy and Is Relevant for Ara h 2eInduced Mast Cell Activation

被引:4
作者
Kwok, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Evans, Ethan [4 ]
Hemmings, Oliver [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewitt, Asa Marknell [5 ]
O'Rourke, Colin [4 ]
Bahnson, Henry T. [4 ,6 ]
Lack, Gideon [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Santos, Alexandra F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Life Course Sci, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth Pediat Allergy, Fac Life Sci & Med, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Immunol & Microbial Sci, Peter Gorer Dept Immunobiol, London, England
[3] Asthma UK Ctr Allerg Mech Asthma, London, England
[4] Benaroya Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Special Allergen Serv SAS, Thermo Fisher, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Immune Tolerance Network, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Evelina London Childrens Hosp, Childrens Allergy Serv, London, England
[8] St Thomas Hosp, Dept Paediat Allergy, 2nd Floor,South Wing, London SE1 7EH, England
关键词
Ara h 2; Diagnosis; Epitope; ImmunoCAP; Peanut allergy; Peptide; mast cell; FOOD ALLERGY; IGE; CHILDREN; PREVALENCE; TOLERANCE; BASOPHIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.023
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A precise diagnosis of peanut allergy is extremely important. We identified 4 Ara h 2 peptides that improved Ara h 2-specific IgE (sIgE) diagnostic accuracy.OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic utility of sIgE to the mixture of these peptides and their role in mast cell response to peanut allergens.METHODS: sIgE to the peptide mix was determined using ImmunoCAP. Its diagnostic utility was compared with Ara h 2-sIgE and sIgE to the individual peptides. The functional rele-vance of the peptides was tested on the mast cell activation test using laboratory of allergic diseases 2 cell line and flow cytometry.RESULTS: A total of 52 peanut-allergic (PA), 36 peanut-sensitized but tolerant, and 9 nonsensitized nonallergic children were studied. Peptide mix-sIgE improved the diagnostic per-formance of Ara h 2-sIgE compared with Ara h 2-sIgE alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve .92 vs .89, respectively; P [ .056). The sensitivity and specificity of Ara h 2-sIgE combined with the peptide mix were 85% and 96%, respectively. sIgE to individual peptides had the highest speci-ficity (91%-96%) but the lowest sensitivity (10%-52%) compared with Ara h 2-sIgE (69% specificity and 87% sensi-tivity) or with peptide mix-sIgE (82% specificity and 63% sensitivity). Peptide 3 directly induced mast cell activation, and the peptide mix inhibited Ara h 2-induced activation of mast cells sensitized with plasma from Ara h 2-positive PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: sIgE to the peptide mix improved the diagnostic performance of Ara h 2-sIgE similarly to sIgE to individual peptides. The peptides interfered with Ara h 2 -induced mast cell activation, confirming its relevance in peanut allergy. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2023;11:3485-92)
引用
收藏
页码:3485 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utility of specific IgE to Ara h 6 in peanut allergy diagnosis
    Pedrosa, Maria
    Boyano-Martinez, Teresa
    Garcia-Ara, Carmen
    Caballero, Teresa
    Quirce, Santiago
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 115 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [22] Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time
    Flinterman, A. E.
    van Hoffen, E.
    den Hartog Jager, C. F.
    Koppelman, S.
    Pasmans, S. G.
    Hoekstra, M. O.
    Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C. A.
    Knulst, A. C.
    Knol, E. F.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2007, 37 (08) : 1221 - 1228
  • [23] Effector activity of peanut allergens: a critical role for Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and their variants
    Porterfield, H. S.
    Murray, K. S.
    Schlichting, D. G.
    Chen, X.
    Hansen, K. C.
    Duncan, M. W.
    Dreskin, S. C.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (07) : 1099 - 1108
  • [24] The predictive relationship between peanut- and Ara h 2-specific serum IgE concentrations and peanut allergy
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    Moverare, Robert
    Sato, Sakura
    Borres, Magnus P.
    Ito, Komei
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2015, 3 (01) : 131 - +
  • [25] Widespread monoclonal IgE antibody convergence to an immunodominant, proanaphylactic Ara h 2 epitope in peanut allergy
    Croote, Derek
    Wong, Joyce J. W.
    Pecalvel, Cyprien
    Leveque, Edouard
    Casanovas, Natacha
    Kamphuis, Jasper B. J.
    Creeks, Paige
    Romero, Johanna
    Sohail, Saba
    Bedinger, Daniel
    Nadeau, Kari C.
    Chinthrajah, Rebecca S.
    Reber, Laurent L.
    Lowman, Henry B.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 153 (01) : 182 - 192.e7
  • [26] Is Ara h 2 indeed the best predictor for peanut allergy in Dutch children?
    Schots, Mirjam
    de Mol, Amerik C.
    Vermeer, Henricus J.
    Roosen, Yvonne M.
    Vriesman, Aldonse W.
    DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 3 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [27] IgE, but not IgG4, antibodies to Ara h 2 distinguish peanut allergy from asymptomatic peanut sensitization
    Hong, X.
    Caruso, D.
    Kumar, R.
    Liu, R.
    Liu, X.
    Wang, G.
    Pongracic, J. A.
    Wang, X.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 (12) : 1538 - 1546
  • [28] Identifying Epithelial Endocytotic Mechanisms of the Peanut Allergens Ara h 1 and Ara h 2
    Price, Dwan
    Ackland, M. Leigh
    Suphioglu, Cenk
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 172 (02) : 106 - 115
  • [29] Isoforms of the major peanut allergen ara h 2: IgE binding in children with peanut allergy
    Hales, BJ
    Bosco, A
    Mills, KL
    Hazell, LA
    Loh, R
    Holt, PG
    Thomas, WR
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 135 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [30] Analysis of the effector activity of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 by selective depletion from a crude peanut extract
    Chen, Xueni
    Zhuang, Yonghua
    Wang, Qian
    Moutsoglou, Daphne
    Ruiz, Glenn
    Yen, S. -E.
    Dreskin, Stephen C.
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 372 (1-2) : 65 - 70