Determining efficacy of dynamic multimedia bowel preparation instructions versus standard instructions on adenoma detection and patient reported measures (DIGICLEAN trial): a study protocol for a multicentre, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Au, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Low, Patrick [2 ]
Rennie, Michael [1 ]
Mohseni, Marriam [1 ]
Song, Yang [3 ]
Kim, Narae [3 ]
Baraty, Brandon [1 ]
Mitrev, Nikola [1 ]
He, Emily [4 ,5 ]
Ho, Vincent [6 ,7 ]
Leong, Rupert [4 ,8 ]
Kariyawasam, Viraj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Clin Res Support Unit, Res & Educ Network, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Concord, NSW, Australia
[5] Canc Council NSW, Daffodil Ctr, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia
[6] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[7] Campbelltown Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
Information technology; Patient-Centered Care; Health informatics; Organisation of health services; Gastrointestinal tumours; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionColonoscopy plays important roles in bowel cancer screening and treatment. Poor bowel preparation occurs in 20-25% of colonoscopies. This negatively impacts adenoma and sessile serrated lesion detection rates, procedural time, requirement for repeat colonoscopies, healthcare costs and likelihood of patient withdrawal from screening programmes. It is unclear whether a combination of multimedia modalities can improve bowel preparation quality, adenoma detection rates and patient-reported measures in those undergoing colonoscopy assessment. MethodsThe DIGICLEAN trial is a prospective, parallel, multicentre, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised controlled trial. The trial will enrol 1294 participants aged 45 years and older who are indicated for a colonoscopy as an outpatient with a positive faecal occult blood test, iron deficiency anaemia or rectal bleeding. Participants will be randomised into the interventional arm, where bowel preparation instructions are delivered via a web-based application which uses scheduled short messaging service, regular patient survey assessment, email and videos; or the control arm, where routine standard written, verbal or emailed instructions are administered. The web-based application will assess patient-reported bloating, constipation and dietary adherence leading up to the colonoscopy. Depending on patient responses, additional aperients may be encouraged digitally in the interventional arm with same instructions made available in written format for the control arm. Patient-reported measures will be collected in both arms the day after the procedure using the validated Newcastle ENDOPREM questionnaire. In some sites, participants will undergo digital pre-anaesthetic screening as well. The co-primary endpoints are the adenoma detection rates and patient-reported measures taken after the colonoscopy. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was obtained from the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH00059). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Lieberman, David A.
    Logan, Judith R.
    Zurfluh, Michael
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [2] Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (04) : 686 - 692
  • [3] SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
    Chan, An-Wen
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Laupacis, Andreas
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Krleza-Jeric, Karmela
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Mann, Howard
    Dickersin, Kay
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Dore, Caroline J.
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Summerskill, William S. M.
    Groves, Trish
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Sox, Harold C.
    Rockhold, Frank W.
    Rennie, Drummond
    Moher, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (03) : 200 - +
  • [4] Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Arora, Sumant
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Chandan, Ojasvini C.
    Kassab, Lena L.
    Murali, Arvind R.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 33 (05) : 730 - 740
  • [5] Colonoscopy clinical care standard, 2020, AUSTR COMM SAF QUAL
  • [6] Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    El Bizri, Maria
    El Sheikh, Mariam
    Lee, Ga Eun
    Sewitch, Maida J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [7] Emery J., 2018, RETHINKING GASTROINT
  • [8] epaq.co.uk, EL PERS ASS QUEST
  • [9] Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative) Development and validation
    Goodhart, Iain M.
    Andrzejowski, John C.
    Jones, Georgina L.
    Berthoud, Mireille
    Dennis, Andy
    Mills, Gary H.
    Radley, Stephen C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (04) : 221 - 228
  • [10] Health AIo Welfare, 2022, NATL BOWEL CANC SCRE