Clinical aspects of digital three-dimensional intraoral scanning in orthodontics-A systematic review

被引:6
作者
Alassiry, Ahmed Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] Najran Univ, Fac Dent, Najran, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Digital scanner; Intraoral scanning; Digital impression; Accuracy; Patient comfort; Systematic review; FULL-ARCH IMPRESSIONS; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; IN-VIVO; FIXED PROSTHODONTICS; SCANNERS; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; VALIDITY; TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.04.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy, reproducibility, scanning time, patient comfort, and operator experience of various commercially available intraoral scanners (IOS) in orthodontics. Methods: An elaborate and extensive search of literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Google Scho-lar, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central databases was performed using various rele-vant keywords. Results: A total of 3256 articles were obtained from all the databases, 35 studies were included. The accuracy of IOS was controversial compared to that of conventional impression techniques. Digital scanning demonstrated satisfactory to excellent reproducibility, shorter scanning time, and improved patient comfort compared with conventional techniques. Conclusion: IOS are time-efficient, comfortable for patients, and simple to use with a learning curve for the operator. These methods are sufficiently accurate for treatment planning and aligner fabrication in orthodontics. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]   ACCURACY OF COMPLETE-ARCH DENTAL IMPRESSIONS: A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING TRUENESS AND PRECISION [J].
Ender, Andreas ;
Mehl, Albert .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 109 (02) :121-128
[12]   A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models [J].
Glisic, Olja ;
Hoejbjerre, Louise ;
Sonnesen, Liselotte .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (06) :868-875
[13]   Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence [J].
Goracci, Cecilia ;
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
Vichi, Alessandro ;
Ferrari, Marco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (04) :422-428
[14]   Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance [J].
Gruenheid, Thorsten ;
McCarthy, Shawn D. ;
Larson, Brent E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 146 (05) :673-682
[15]  
Hajeer M Y, 2004, J Orthod, V31, P62, DOI 10.1179/146531204225011346
[16]  
Harrell E.R, 2018, Decis. Dent, V4, P17
[17]   Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study [J].
Imburgia, Mario ;
Logozzo, Silvia ;
Hauschild, Uli ;
Veronesi, Giovanni ;
Mangano, Carlo ;
Mangano, Francesco Guido .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2017, 17
[18]   Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Joda, Tim ;
Lenherr, Patrik ;
Dedem, Philipp ;
Kovaltschuk, Irina ;
Bragger, Urs ;
Zitzmann, Nicola U. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (10) :1318-1323
[19]   Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis [J].
Joda, Tim ;
Braegger, Urs .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (12) :1430-1435
[20]   Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners [J].
Kim, Jisun ;
Park, Ji-Man ;
Kim, Minji ;
Heo, Seong-Joo ;
Shin, Im Hee ;
Kim, Miae .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (02) :221-230