Clinical aspects of digital three-dimensional intraoral scanning in orthodontics-A systematic review

被引:6
作者
Alassiry, Ahmed Mohammed [1 ]
机构
[1] Najran Univ, Fac Dent, Najran, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Digital scanner; Intraoral scanning; Digital impression; Accuracy; Patient comfort; Systematic review; FULL-ARCH IMPRESSIONS; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; IN-VIVO; FIXED PROSTHODONTICS; SCANNERS; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; VALIDITY; TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.04.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy, reproducibility, scanning time, patient comfort, and operator experience of various commercially available intraoral scanners (IOS) in orthodontics. Methods: An elaborate and extensive search of literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Google Scho-lar, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central databases was performed using various rele-vant keywords. Results: A total of 3256 articles were obtained from all the databases, 35 studies were included. The accuracy of IOS was controversial compared to that of conventional impression techniques. Digital scanning demonstrated satisfactory to excellent reproducibility, shorter scanning time, and improved patient comfort compared with conventional techniques. Conclusion: IOS are time-efficient, comfortable for patients, and simple to use with a learning curve for the operator. These methods are sufficiently accurate for treatment planning and aligner fabrication in orthodontics. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Agnini A., 2015, DIGITAL REVOLUTION L
[2]   Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review [J].
Ahlholm, Pekka ;
Sipila, Kirsi ;
Vallittu, Pekka ;
Jakonen, Minna ;
Kotiranta, Ulla .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01) :35-41
[3]   Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners [J].
Amornvit, Pokpong ;
Rokaya, Dinesh ;
Sanohkan, Sasiwimol .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
[4]   Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review [J].
Aragon, Monica L. C. ;
Pontes, Luana F. ;
Bichara, Livia M. ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Normando, David .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (04) :429-434
[5]   Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients [J].
Burhardt, Lukasz ;
Livas, Christos ;
Kerdijk, Wouter ;
van der Meer, Wicher Joerd ;
Ren, Yijin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (02) :261-267
[6]   Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction [J].
Burzynski, Jennifer A. ;
Firestone, Allen R. ;
Beck, F. Michael ;
Fields, Henry W., Jr. ;
Deguchi, Toru .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 153 (04) :534-541
[7]  
Chochlidakis KM, 2016, J PROSTHET DENT, V116, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
[8]   Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? [J].
Christensen, Gordon J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 139 (06) :761-763
[9]  
Duvert Romain, 2017, Orthod Fr, V88, P347, DOI 10.1051/orthodfr/2017024
[10]   In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions [J].
Ender, Andreas ;
Attin, Thomas ;
Mehl, Albert .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (03) :313-320