Biology Instructors See Value in Discussing Controversial Topics but Fear Personal and Professional Consequences

被引:14
作者
Beatty, Abby E. [1 ]
Driessen, Emily P. [1 ]
Clark, Amanda D. [1 ]
Costello, Robin A. [1 ]
Ewell, Sharday [1 ]
Fagbodun, Sheritta [3 ]
Klabacka, Randy L. [1 ]
Lamb, Todd [1 ]
Mulligan, Kimberly [2 ]
Henning, Jeremiah A. [4 ]
Ballen, Cissy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Off Inclus Equ & Divers, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[3] Tuskegee Univ, Dept Biol, Tuskegee, AL 36088 USA
[4] Univ S Alabama, Dept Biol, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
来源
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION | 2023年 / 22卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES; SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES; ARGUMENTATION SKILLS; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; CHALLENGES; CLASSROOM; CONTEXT; KNOWLEDGE; PEDAGOGY; REFORM;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.22-06-0108
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Traditional biology curricula depict science as an objective field, overlooking the important influence that human values and biases have on what is studied and who can be a scien-tist. We can work to address this shortcoming by incorporating ideological awareness into the curriculum, which is an understanding of biases, stereotypes, and assumptions that shape contemporary and historical science. We surveyed a national sample of lower-level biology instructors to determine 1) why it is important for students to learn science, 2) the perceived educational value of ideological awareness in the classroom, and 3) hesitancies associated with ideological awareness implementation. We found that most instructors reported "understanding the world" as the main goal of science education. Despite the perceived value of ideological awareness, such as increasing student engagement and dispelling misconceptions, instructors were hesitant to implement ideological awareness modules due to potential personal and professional consequences.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Aikenhead G., 2002, RENEGOTIATING CULTUR
  • [2] American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2011, VIS CHANG UND BIOL E
  • [3] Andrews T. C., 2021, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, V53, P25, DOI [10.1080/00091383.2021.1883974, DOI 10.1080/00091383.2021.1883974]
  • [4] It's Personal: Biology Instructors Prioritize Personal Evidence over Empirical Evidence in Teaching Decisions
    Andrews, Tessa C.
    Lemons, Paula P.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 14 (01):
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, Fast Facts
  • [6] Race Matters
    Asai, David J.
    [J]. CELL, 2020, 181 (04) : 754 - 757
  • [7] A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses
    Ballen, Cissy J.
    Blum, Jessamina E.
    Brownell, Sara
    Hebert, Sadie
    Hewlett, James
    Klein, Joanna R.
    McDonald, Erik A.
    Monti, Denise L.
    Nold, Stephen C.
    Slemmons, Krista E.
    Soneral, Paula A. G.
    Cotner, Sehoya
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (02):
  • [8] Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, DOI DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • [9] Teaching the Tough Topics: Fostering Ideological Awareness through the Inclusion of Societally Impactful Topics in Introductory Biology
    Beatty, Abby E.
    Driessen, Emily P.
    Gusler, Taylor
    Ewell, Sharday
    Grilliot, Amy
    Ballen, Cissy J.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (04):
  • [10] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6