Effects of anterior maxillary distraction compared to LeFort-1 osteotomy and total maxillary distraction osteogenesis for treating hypoplastic maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate- A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Kaur, Harneet [1 ]
Grover, Seema [2 ]
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar [3 ]
Sidhu, M. S. [2 ]
Jaglan, Archana [2 ]
Dogra, Namrata [2 ]
机构
[1] Jamia Millia Islamia, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, New Delhi 110025, India
[2] SGT Univ, Fac Dent Sci, Dept Orthodont, Haryana 122505, India
[3] Narayana Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Nellore 524003, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Cleft palate; Orthognathic surgery; Distraction osteogenesis; Maxillary retrusion; Malocclusion Osteotomy; LE-FORT-I; SEGMENTAL DISTRACTION; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; ADVANCEMENT; MANAGEMENT; MOVEMENT; MIDFACE; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jormas.2022.10.007
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the treatment outcomes and effectiveness of Anterior Maxillary Distraction (AMD) with the LeFort I Osteotomy and Total Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis (TMDO) to treat cleft maxillary hypoplasia. Methods: (PROSPERO CRD42020223345) Thorough electronic search of seven databases, unpublished gray literature, and a hand search of the relevant studies reference lists was done. Studies assessing mid-facial skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue outcomes of AMD in patients >8 years of age, hypoplastic cleft maxilla, and with either TMDO/LeFort 1/ both as control groups were included. Seven included articles were assessed for the study characteristics and qualitative synthesis. Three studies were analyzed quantitatively using the RevMan 5.4 software. The quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane ROB2 and the overall certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: AMD was performed in 241 subjects, LeFort 1 in 145 subjects, and TMDO in 42 subjects. Maxillary advancement for AMD and LeFort 1 groups showed no statistically significant difference (Mean Difference, MD -0.64 degrees) while TMDO showed statistically significant advancement than AMD (MD -1.44 degrees). Statistically significant upward rotation of anterior maxilla was noted with AMD (MD -6.15 degrees) than Lefort 1. Upper incisor inclination improved in both AMD and TMDO groups (MD 1.5 degrees). Improvement in the maxilla-mandibular relationship, convexity of face, lip and nose, and marked dentoalveolar changes in overjet and upper incisor position were noted in all the three groups. Discernible airway alterations were noted in LeFort 1 and TMDOs. Total relapse was the least with AMD. Conclusion: Distraction osteogenesis exhibited better dento-skeletal outcomes and minor skeletal relapse than LeFort 1. TMDO is a preferred modality in treating severe maxillary hypoplasia associated with CLP than AMD. Further long-term prospective comparative studies are required, possibly involving the patient-centric merits. (c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Rotational movement of the anterior maxillary segment by hybrid distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate [J].
Aikawa, Tomonao ;
Haraguchi, Seiji ;
Tanaka, Susumu ;
Uematsu, Setsuko ;
Ishibashi, Miki ;
Kogo, Mikihiko ;
Iida, Seiji .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 110 (03) :292-300
[2]   Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis:: Report of 2 cases [J].
Alkan, Alper ;
Bas, Burcu ;
Oezer, Mete ;
Bayram, Mehmet ;
Yuezbasioglu, Emir .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (01) :126-132
[3]  
Ashith MV, 2019, BIOMED PHARMACOL J, V12, P1899, DOI [10.13005/bpj/1821, DOI 10.13005/bpj/1821]
[4]   Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction:: A preliminary report [J].
Bengi, Osman ;
Karacay, Seniz ;
Akin, Erol ;
Okcu, Kemal Murat ;
Oelmez, Hiiseyin ;
Mermut, Sila .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 35 (6-7) :302-310
[5]   A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis [J].
Cheung, LK ;
Chua, HDP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 35 (01) :14-24
[6]   Distraction osteogenesis of the hypoplastic midface using a rigid external distraction system: The results of a one- to six-year follow-up [J].
Cho, Byung Chae ;
Kyung, Hee Mun .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (05) :1201-1212
[7]   Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function [J].
Chua, H. D. P. ;
Whitehill, T. L. ;
Samman, N. ;
Cheung, L. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (07) :633-640
[8]   Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery-which one is more stable in 5 years? [J].
Chua, Hannah Daile P. ;
Hagg, Margareta Bendeus ;
Cheung, Lim Kwong .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 109 (06) :803-814
[9]  
Dolanmaz D, 2003, ANGLE ORTHOD, V73, P201
[10]   Maxillomandibular Distraction Osteogenesis [J].
Efunkoya, Akinwale A. ;
Bamgbose, Babatunde O. ;
Adebola, Rafael A. ;
Adeoye, Joshua B. ;
Akpasa, Izegboya O. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (05) :1787-1792