An analysis of degradation in low-cost particulate matter sensors

被引:11
作者
deSouza, Priyanka [1 ,2 ]
Barkjohn, Karoline [3 ]
Clements, Andrea [3 ]
Lee, Jenny [4 ]
Kahn, Ralph [5 ]
Crawford, Ben [6 ]
Kinney, Patrick [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, CU Populat Ctr, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
[3] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[6] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[7] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02118 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES | 2023年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
AIR-POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1039/d2ea00142j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low-cost sensors (LCSs) are increasingly being used to measure fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in cities around the world. One of the most commonly deployed LCSs is PurpleAir with similar to 15 000 sensors deployed in the United States, alone. PurpleAir measurements are widely used by the public to evaluate PM2.5 levels in their neighborhoods. PurpleAir measurements are also increasingly being integrated into models by researchers to develop large-scale estimates of PM2.5. However, the change in sensor performance over time has not been well studied. It is important to understand the lifespan of these sensors to determine when they should be serviced or replaced, and when measurements from these devices should or should not be used for various applications. This paper fills this gap by leveraging the fact that: (1) each PurpleAir sensor is composed of two identical sensors and the divergence between their measurements can be observed, and (2) there are numerous PurpleAir sensors within 50 meters of regulatory monitors allowing for the comparison of measurements between these instruments. We propose empirically-derived degradation outcomes for the PurpleAir sensors and evaluate how these outcomes change over time. On average, we find that the number of 'flagged' measurements, where the two sensors within each PurpleAir sensor disagree, increases with time to similar to 4% after 4 years of operation. Approximately, 2 percent of all PurpleAir sensors were permanently degraded. The largest fraction of permanently degraded PurpleAir sensors appeared to be in the hot and humid climate zone, suggesting that sensors in these locations may need to be replaced more frequently. We also find that the bias of PurpleAir sensors, or the difference between corrected PM2.5 levels and the corresponding reference measurements, changed over time by -0.12 mu g m(-3) (95% CI: -0.13 mu g m(-3), -0.10 mu g m(-3)) per year. The average bias increases dramatically after 3.5 years. Further, climate zone is a significant modifier of the association between degradation outcomes and time.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 536
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Anderson B.G., 2016, Weathermetrics: functions to convert between weather metrics
  • [2] Ardon-Dryer K., 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, V2019, P1, DOI [10.5194/amt-2019-396, DOI 10.5194/AMT-2019-396]
  • [3] Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PM2.5 Measurements for Extreme Wildfire Smoke
    Barkjohn, Karoline K.
    Holder, Amara L.
    Frederick, Samuel G.
    Clements, Andrea L.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (24)
  • [4] Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor
    Barkjohn, Karoline K.
    Gantt, Brett
    Clements, Andrea L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2021, 14 (06) : 4617 - 4637
  • [5] Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Wildani, Avani
    Chang, Howard H.
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (04) : 2152 - 2162
  • [6] Air Pollution, Socioeconomic Status, and Age-Specific Mortality Risk in the United States
    Boing, Antonio Fernando
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Boing, Alexandra Crispim
    Kim, Rockli
    Subramanian, S. V.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (05)
  • [7] Characterization of Spatial Air Pollution Patterns Near a Large Railyard Area in Atlanta, Georgia
    Brantley, Halley L.
    Hagler, Gayle S. W.
    Herndon, Scott C.
    Massoli, Paola
    Bergin, Michael H.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (04)
  • [8] Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?
    Castell, Nuria
    Dauge, Franck R.
    Schneider, Philipp
    Vogt, Matthias
    Lerner, Uri
    Fishbain, Barak
    Broday, David
    Bartonova, Alena
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 99 : 293 - 302
  • [9] Investigating Use of Low-Cost Sensors to Increase Accuracy and Equity of Real-Time Air Quality Information
    Considine, Ellen M.
    Braun, Danielle
    Kamareddine, Leila
    Nethery, Rachel C.
    deSouza, Priyanka
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (03) : 1391 - 1402
  • [10] deSouza P., 2022, ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREM, P1, DOI DOI 10.5194/AMT-2022-65