Recent Use of Pediatric Extrapolation in Pediatric Drug Development in US

被引:5
作者
Ye, Jingjing [1 ]
Zhang, Vickie [2 ]
Strimenopoulou, Foteini [3 ]
Zhao, Yihua [4 ]
Pan, Haitao [5 ]
Shabbout, Mayadah [6 ]
Gamalo, Margaret [7 ]
机构
[1] BeiGene, Global Stat & Data Sci GSDS, Fulton, MD 80011 USA
[2] Global Biometr, Servier Pharmaceut, Boston, MA USA
[3] UCB Pharm, Ctr Excellence Stat Innovat CESI, Slough, England
[4] Flatiron Hlth Inc, Quantitat Sci, New York, NY USA
[5] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Biostat, Memphis, TN USA
[6] GlaxoSmithKline, Biostat, Collegeville, PA USA
[7] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词
Pediatric label; extrapolation; efficacy; safety; source and target population; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2023.2170407
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The regulatory standards of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require substantial evidence of effectiveness from adequate and well-controlled trials, for drugs developed in both adults and children. However, when scientifically justified, relying on extrapolation may be acceptable. Historically, the FDA's extrapolation approach was based on draft guidance published in 2014, which introduced the categories of full, partial, and no extrapolation. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) took a different view on pediatric extrapolation. To better understand the use of extrapolation to support pediatric drug development and approval, we reviewed the pediatric labeling changes published by the FDA, focusing on the labeling updates between 1/1/2015 and 7/31/2021, the period where the extrapolation approach is in transition to harmonize with the EMA. Within this time window, among the 265 drugs and biological products with pediatric labeling changes, 169 (63.8%) were identified where extrapolation was used. This includes 64 (24.2%) labeling changes, where full extrapolation was used, and 105 (39.6%) labeling changes, where partial extrapolation was used. The major disease areas that extrapolation was used include neuroscience (40/53, 75.5%) and infectious disease (20/28, 71.4%). The extrapolation approach was identified in terms of source population beyond the use of adult as well as extrapolation from clinical trials conducted in the same drug class. The use of extrapolation increased the rates of new and expanded pediatric indication in the period. This review gives the most recent landscape of pediatric labeling changes using extrapolation. With the released ICH (International Council for Harmonization) E11A guidance in April 2022, the paper also provides insights for future pediatric drug development programs.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 695
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Need for Pediatric Drug Development
    Ward, Robert M.
    Benjamin, Daniel K., Jr.
    Davis, Jonathan M.
    Gorman, Richard L.
    Kauffman, Ralph
    Kearns, Gregory L.
    Murphy, Mary Dianne
    Sherwin, Catherine M. T.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 192 : 13 - 21
  • [22] Statistical modeling for Bayesian extrapolation of adult clinical trial information in pediatric drug evaluation
    Gamalo-Siebers, Margaret
    Savic, Jasmina
    Basu, Cynthia
    Zhao, Xin
    Gopalakrishnan, Mathangi
    Gao, Aijun
    Song, Guochen
    Baygani, Simin
    Thompson, Laura
    Xia, H. Amy
    Price, Karen
    Tiwari, Ram
    Carlin, Bradley P.
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2017, 16 (04) : 232 - 249
  • [23] Pediatric Extrapolation Approach for US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Brexpiprazole in Patients Aged 13 to 17 Years with Schizophrenia
    Zhang, Huixia
    Liu, Jie
    Sharma, Vishnu
    Zhuang, Luning
    Horn, Pamela
    Uppoor, Ramana
    Mehta, Mehul
    Zhu, Hao
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 64 (07) : 771 - 778
  • [24] Duration of Pediatric Clinical Trials Submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration
    Zimmerman, Kanecia O.
    Smith, P. Brian
    McMahon, Ann W.
    Temeck, Jean
    Avant, Debbie
    Murphy, Dianne
    McCune, Susan
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2019, 173 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [25] Pediatric Versus Adult Drug Trials for Conditions With High Pediatric Disease Burden
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    Murthy, Srinivas
    Pinto, Catia
    Olson, Karen L.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Mandl, Kenneth D.
    PEDIATRICS, 2012, 130 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [26] Failed Pediatric Drug Development Trials
    Momper, J. D.
    Mulugeta, Y.
    Burckart, G. J.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 98 (03) : 245 - 251
  • [27] Pediatric drug development: formulation considerations
    Ali, Areeg Anwer
    Charoo, Naseem Ahmad
    Abdallah, Daud Baraka
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2014, 40 (10) : 1283 - 1299
  • [28] Pharmacogenomics in pediatric medicine and drug development
    Schreeck, Filippa
    Ahne, Gabriele
    Tremmel, Roman
    Schaeffeler, Elke
    Schwab, Matthias
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2022, 23 (13) : 709 - 712
  • [29] Biopharmaceutic Planning in Pediatric Drug Development
    Purohit, Vivek S.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (03): : 519 - 522
  • [30] Seizure Rescue Medication Use among US Pediatric Epilepsy Providers: A Survey of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium
    Wallace, Adam
    Wirrell, Elaine
    Payne, Eric
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 212 : 111 - 116