Dynamic firm performance and estimator choice: A comparison of dynamic panel data estimators

被引:8
作者
Cave, Joshua [1 ]
Chaudhuri, Kausik [1 ]
Kumbhakar, Subal C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Maurice Keyworth Bldg, Leeds LS6 1AN, England
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Econ, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
Dynamic panel data models; Monte Carlo simulations; Total factor productivity; Efficiency; ADJUSTMENT VALUATION APPROACH; CAPITAL STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER MODEL; BUSINESS VALUE; VARIABLE SPEEDS; GMM ESTIMATOR; BIAS; DEA; EFFICIENCY; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Dynamic panel data models are increasingly and extensively used in operational research and perfor-mance analysis as researchers seek to better understand the dynamic behaviors of firms. However, esti-mation of the lagged dependent variable in conjunction with the time-invariant individual effect leads to a number of econometric issues. While several methodologies exist to overcome such complexities, there is little consensus on the appropriate method of estimation. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of different dynamic panel estimators across a range of common settings experienced by researchers. In-stead of focusing on one single criterion of assessment, we employ multiple evaluative metrics across multiple experiments to provide a more extensive analysis of dynamic panel estimators. Taking all simu-lations into account, we find the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator to be the most robust and reliable estimator across empirical settings. We illustrate our findings with two empirical applications and show that the choice of estimator significantly affects the interpretation of firms' productivity and efficiency persistence. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 467
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for it can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies [J].
Abdallah, Wissam ;
Goergen, Marc ;
O'Sullivan, Noel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (04) :791-804
[2]  
Ahn S., 2000, Econometric Reviews, V19, P461, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07474930008800482, 10.1080/07474930008800482]
[3]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF MODELS FOR DYNAMIC PANEL-DATA [J].
AHN, SC ;
SCHMIDT, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :5-27
[4]   Dynamic pricing of remanufacturable products under demand substitution: a product life cycle model [J].
Akan, Mustafa ;
Ata, Baris ;
Savaskan-Ebert, R. Canan .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 211 (01) :1-25
[5]   The effect of farm genetics expenses on dynamic productivity growth [J].
Ali, Beshir M. ;
de Mey, Yann ;
Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 290 (02) :701-717
[6]   The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators [J].
Alvarez, J ;
Arellano, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (04) :1121-1159
[7]   Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews [J].
Archak, Nikolay ;
Ghose, Anindya ;
Ipeirotis, Panagiotis G. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (08) :1485-1509
[8]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[9]   Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter? [J].
Badunenko, Oleg ;
Kumbhakar, Subal C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 260 (02) :789-803
[10]  
Baltagi B.H., 1992, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V3, P321, DOI DOI 10.1016/0954-349X(92)90010-4