Efficiency of Entrepreneurial Universities in India: A Data Envelopment Analysis

被引:10
作者
Loganathan, Muralidharan [1 ]
Subrahmanya, M. H. Bala [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Management Studies, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Entrepreneurial university; Efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Third mission; Ambidexterity; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; AMBIDEXTERITY; INNOVATION; IMPACT; DEA;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-022-00897-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
High expectations are placed on universities to deliver well beyond their traditional outcomes (graduation and research) and support societal outcomes as their third mission and beyond. Yet, we see a dearth of performance measurements and research comparing universities considering the third mission outcomes, particularly around entrepreneurship support. To address this need, we rely on the ambidexterity perspective and use a slack-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) to compare efficiencies of 28 Indian universities in delivering entrepreneurship support alongside their traditional outcomes. The contribution of the study is two-fold. Firstly, we rate and compare the universities and identify the orientations towards particular mission outcomes of graduation, research, and entrepreneurship support. From our analysis, we find that fully efficient universities were only a few and were performing well across all the three outcomes. Secondly, we then use orientation and efficiency as a way to measure extent to which the universities can pursue third mission outcomes given their history. We note a path dependence among private universities that have mostly developed with a graduation orientation, to shift to entrepreneurship support without a research base. The study also comments on improving the existing national university ranking mechanisms that use subjective weights and does not consider the scale and orientation of the universities.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1144
页数:25
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Akcomak S., 2011, Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Development, P228, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199596515.003.0010
[2]   When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Makela, Kristiina ;
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
D'Este, Pablo .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (08) :1424-1447
[3]   Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Cunningham, James A. ;
Kuratko, Donald F. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. ;
Menter, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2019, 44 (02) :313-325
[4]   From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society [J].
Audretsch, David B. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2014, 39 (03) :313-321
[5]   Comparing research performance of private universities in India with IITs, central universities and NITs [J].
Banshal, Sumit Kumar ;
Singh, Vivek Kumar ;
Mayr, Philipp .
CURRENT SCIENCE, 2019, 116 (08) :1304-1313
[6]  
Bartlett, 1991, ACAD MANAGE REV, V16, P225, DOI [10.2307/258620, DOI 10.2307/258620]
[7]  
Birley S., 2004, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V29, P235, DOI [10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.f3, DOI 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.F3]
[8]  
Campbell CAIlen., 1987, ECON DEV Q, V1, P178, DOI 10.1177/089124248700100209
[9]  
Carayannis E.G., 2012, J INNOVATION ENTREPR, P1, DOI [10.1186/2192-5372-1-2, DOI 10.1186/2192-5372-1-2]
[10]   Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity [J].
Centobelli, Piera ;
Cerchione, Roberto ;
Esposito, Emilio ;
Shashi .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 141 :172-194