Improved Outcomes and Therapy Longevity after Salvage Using a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation System for Chronic Pain: Multicenter, Observational, European Case Series

被引:5
|
作者
Rigoard, Philippe [1 ]
Billot, Maxime [1 ]
Bougeard, Renaud [2 ]
Llopis, Jose Emilio [3 ]
Raoul, Sylvie [4 ]
Matis, Georgios [5 ]
Vesper, Jan [6 ]
Belaid, Hayat [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers Hosp, PRISMATICS Lab, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[2] Clin Sauvegarde, F-69009 Lyon, France
[3] Hosp Univ Ribera, Valencia 46600, Spain
[4] CHU Nantes Hop Laennec, F-44800 St Herblain, France
[5] Uniklin Koln, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Klinikum Dusseldorf, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[7] Fdn Adolphe De Rothschild, F-75019 Paris, France
关键词
chronic pain; spinal cord stimulation; system conversion; waveform therapy; BURST; NEUROSTIMULATION; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; RELIEF; SCS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13041079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is proven to effectively relieve chronic neuropathic pain. However, some implanted patients may face loss of efficacy (LoE) over time, and conversion to more recent devices may rescue SCS therapy. Recent SCS systems offer novel stimulation capabilities, such as temporal modulation and spatial neural targeting, and can be used to replace previous neurostimulators without changing existing leads. Our multicenter, observational, consecutive case series investigated real-world clinical outcomes in previously implanted SCS patients who were converted to a new implantable pulse generator. Data from 58 patients in seven European centers were analyzed (total follow-up 7.0 years, including 1.4 years after conversion). In the Rescue (LoE) subgroup (n = 51), the responder rate was 58.5% at the last follow-up, and overall pain scores (numerical rating scale) had decreased from 7.3 +/- 1.7 with the previous SCS system to 3.5 +/- 2.5 (p < 0.0001). Patients who converted for improved battery longevity (n = 7) had their pain scores sustained below 3/10 with their new neurostimulator. Waveform preferences were diverse and patient dependent (34.4% standard rate; 44.8% sub-perception modalities; 20.7% combination therapy). Our results suggest that patients who experience LoE over time may benefit from upgrading to a more versatile SCS system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Real-World Outcomes Using a Spinal Cord Stimulation Device Capable of Combination Therapy for Chronic Pain: A European, Multicenter Experience
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Paz-Solis, Jose Francisco
    De Negri, Pasquale
    Canos-Verdecho, Maria Angeles
    Belaid, Hayat
    Thomson, Simon J.
    Abejon, David
    Vesper, Jan
    Mehta, Vivek
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Maino, Paolo
    Love-Jones, Sarah
    Pena, Isaac F.
    Bayerl, Simon
    Perruchoud, Christophe
    Bougeard, Renaud
    Mertz, Cleo
    Pei, Yu
    Jain, Roshini
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [2] Salvage Therapy With Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Case Report
    Delange Segura, Laureano
    Rodriguez Padilla, Marisa
    Palomino Jimenez, Maria Teresa
    Fernandez Baena, Mariano
    Rodriguez Staff, Jose Felipe
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (05) : 530 - 535
  • [3] Immediate Abdominal Pain after Placement of Thoracic Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series
    Lee, Jonathan J.
    Sadrameli, Saeed S.
    Desai, Virendra R.
    Austerman, Ryan J.
    Leonard, Dean M.
    Dalm, Brian D.
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 96 (06) : 400 - 405
  • [4] Early Experience With a Novel Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain of the Back and Legs
    Salmon, John
    Bates, Dan
    Du Toit, Neels
    Verrills, Paul
    Yu, James
    Taverner, Murray G.
    Mohabbati, Vahid
    Green, Matthew
    Heit, Gary
    Levy, Robert
    Staats, Peter
    Ruais, Jonathan
    Kottalgi, Shilpa
    Makous, James
    Mitchell, Bruce
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (01): : 172 - 181
  • [5] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Single-Center Case Series
    Sokal, Pawel
    Palus, Damian
    Jablonska, Magdalena
    Puk, Oskar
    Kieronska-Siwak, Sara
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 2029 - 2035
  • [6] Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Treatment for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Refractory to Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series
    Yang, Ajax
    Hunter, Corey W.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (07): : 703 - 707
  • [7] 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Thoracic Pain: A Multicenter Case Series and a Guide for Optimal Anatomic Lead Placement
    Sayed, Dawood
    Foster, Jeffrey
    Nairizi, Ali
    Sills, Shawn
    Miller, Andrew
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (04) : E369 - E376
  • [8] Two-Year Outcomes Using Fast-Acting, Sub-Perception Therapy for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A European, Real-World, Multicenter Experience
    Bayerl, Simon
    Paz-Solis, Jose
    Matis, Georgios
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Canos-Verdecho, M. Angeles
    Vesper, Jan
    Llopis, Jose Emilio
    Kyriakopoulos, Georgios
    Gulve, Ashish
    Raoul, Sylvie
    Papa, Alfonso
    Love-Jones, Sarah
    Williams, Adam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (22)
  • [9] Machine learning predicts spinal cord stimulation surgery outcomes and reveals novel neural markers for chronic pain
    Gopal, Jay
    Bao, Jonathan
    Harland, Tessa
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Paniccioli, Steven
    Grey, Rachael
    Briotte, Michael
    Mccarthy, Kevin
    Telkes, Ilknur
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [10] High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Al-Kaisy, Adnan
    Smet, Iris
    Palmisani, Stefano
    Smith, Thomas
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (01): : 59 - 66