Machine learning tools to improve nonlinear modeling parameters of RC columns

被引:6
作者
Koodiani, Hamid Khodadadi [1 ]
Jafari, Elahe [1 ]
Majlesi, Arsalan [1 ]
Shahin, Mohammad [2 ]
Matamoros, Adolfo [1 ]
Alaeddini, Adel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Civil Engn Dept, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[2] Univ Texas San Antonio, Mech Engn Dept, San Antonio, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 84卷
关键词
ACI; 369.1; ASCE; 41; Classification; Concrete columns; Machine learning; Modes of failure; Modeling parameters; Nonlinear response; CONCRETE COLUMNS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108492
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Modeling parameters are essential to the fidelity of nonlinear models of concrete structures subjected to earthquake ground motions, especially when simulating seismic events strong enough to cause collapse. This paper addresses two of the most significant barriers to improving nonlinear modeling provisions in seismic evaluation standards using experimental data sets: identifying the most likely mode of failure of structural components, and implementing data fitting techniques capable of recognizing interdependencies between input parameters and nonlinear relationships between input parameters and model outputs. Machine learning tools in the Scikit-learn and Pytorch libraries were used to calibrate equations and black -box numerical models for nonlinear modeling parameters (MP) a and b of reinforced concrete columns defined in the ASCE 41 and ACI 369.1 standards, and to estimate their most likely mode of failure. It was found that machine learning regression models and machine learning black -boxes were more accurate than current provisions in the ACI 369.1/ASCE 41 Standards. Among the regression models, Regularized Linear Regression was the most accurate for estimating MP a, and Polynomial Regression was the most accurate for estimating MP b. The two black -box models evaluated, namely the Gaussian Process Regression and the Neural Network (NN), provided the most accurate estimates of MPs a and b. The NN model was the most accurate machine learning tool of all evaluated. A multi -class classification tool from the Scikit-learn machine learning library correctly identified column mode of failure with 79 % accuracy for rectangular columns and with 81 % accuracy for circular columns, a substantial improvement over the classification rules in ASCE 41-13.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1973, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, Seismic rehabilitation of existing building
  • [3] Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review
    Ben Chaabene, Wassim
    Flah, Majdi
    Nehdi, Moncef L.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 260
  • [4] Brachmann I., 2004, DRIFT DEPENDENT CONF
  • [5] A comparison of machine learning- and regression-based models for predicting ductility ratio of RC beam-column joints
    Dabiri, Hamed
    Rahimzadeh, Khashayar
    Kheyroddin, Ali
    [J]. STRUCTURES, 2022, 37 : 69 - 81
  • [6] Update to ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions
    Elwood, Kenneth J.
    Matamoros, Adolfo B.
    Wallace, John W.
    Lehman, Dawn E.
    Heintz, Jon A.
    Mitchell, Andrew D.
    Moore, Mark A.
    Valley, Michael T.
    Lowes, Laura N.
    Comartin, Craig D.
    Moehle, Jack P.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2007, 23 (03) : 493 - 523
  • [7] Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement
    Elwood, KJ
    Moehle, JP
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2005, 21 (01) : 71 - 89
  • [8] Elwood KJ, 2005, ACI STRUCT J, V102, P578
  • [9] Engineers ASoC, 2017, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings
  • [10] Failure mode classification and bearing capacity prediction for reinforced concrete columns based on ensemble machine learning algorithm
    Feng, De-Cheng
    Liu, Zhen-Tao
    Wang, Xiao-Dan
    Jiang, Zhong-Ming
    Liang, Shi-Xue
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2020, 45