Probabilistic seasonal precipitation forecasts using quantiles of ensemble forecasts

被引:4
作者
Jin, Huidong [1 ]
Mahani, Mona E. [2 ]
Li, Ming [3 ]
Shao, Quanxi [3 ]
Crimp, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Data61, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Inst Climate Energy & Disaster Solut, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] CSIRO Data61, POB 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
关键词
Probabilistic forecast; Seasonal forecast; Monthly precipitation; Bayesian model averaging; Deterministic forecast; Quantile; CLIMATE MODELS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-024-02668-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Seasonal precipitation forecasting is vital for weather-sensitive sectors. Global Circulation Models (GCM) routinely produce ensemble Seasonal Climate Forecasts (SCFs) but suffer from issues like low forecast resolution and skills. To address these issues in this study, we introduce a post-processing method, Quantile Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging (QEBMA). It utilises quantiles from a GCM ensemble forecast to create a pseudo-ensemble forecast. Through their reasonable linear relationships with observations, each pseudo-member connects a hurdle distribution with a point mass at zero for dry months and a gamma distribution for wet months. These distributions are mixed to construct a forecast probability distribution with their weights, proportional to the quantiles' historical forecast performance. QEBMA is applied to three GCMs, including GloSea5 from the United Kingdom, ECMWF from Europe and ACCESS-S1 from Australia, for monthly precipitation forecasts in 32 locations across four climate zones in Australia. Leave-one-month-out cross-validation results illustrate that QEBMA enhances forecast skills compared to raw GCMs and other post-processing techniques, including quantile mapping and Extended Copula Post-Processing (ECPP), for forecast lead time of 0 to 2 months, based on five metrics. The skill improvements achieved by QEBMA are often statistically significant, particularly when compared to raw GCM forecasts across the 32 study locations. Among these post-processing models, only QEBMA consistently outperforms the SCF benchmark climatology, offering a promising alternative for improving seasonal precipitation forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:2041 / 2063
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Censored and shifted gamma distribution based EMOS model for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting [J].
Baran, Sandor ;
Nemoda, Dora .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2016, 27 (05) :280-292
[2]   Multivariate quantile mapping bias correction: an N-dimensional probability density function transform for climate model simulations of multiple variables [J].
Cannon, Alex J. .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 50 (1-2) :31-49
[3]   An adaptive spatial model for precipitation data from multiple satellites over large regions [J].
Chakraborty, Avishek ;
De, Swarup ;
Bowman, Kenneth P. ;
Sang, Huiyan ;
Genton, Marc G. ;
Mallick, Bani K. .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2015, 25 (02) :389-405
[4]   Statistical postprocessing of dynamically downscaled outputs of CFS.v2 [J].
Falamarzi, Yashar ;
Pakdaman, Morteza ;
Javanshiri, Zohreh .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (06) :2379-2397
[5]   Bayesian Model Averaging: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Classification [J].
Fragoso, Tiago M. ;
Bertoli, Wesley ;
Louzada, Francisco .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2018, 86 (01) :1-28
[6]  
Fraley C., 2018, ensembleBMA: probabilistic forecasting using ensembles and bayesian model averaging
[7]   Calibrating Multimodel Forecast Ensembles with Exchangeable and Missing Members Using Bayesian Model Averaging [J].
Fraley, Chris ;
Raftery, Adrian E. ;
Gneiting, Tilmann .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (01) :190-202
[8]  
Griffiths M, 2023, ACCESS S2 UPDATES IM, P218
[9]  
Hamill TM, 2004, MON WEATHER REV, V132, P1434, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1434:ERIMFS>2.0.CO
[10]  
2