Experimental and numerical analysis of the thermal performance of pebble solar thermal collector

被引:3
|
作者
Naik, N. Channa Keshava [1 ]
Priya, R. Krishna [2 ]
Agulut, Umit [3 ]
Gurel, Ali Etem [4 ]
Shaik, Saboor [5 ]
Alzaed, Ali Nasser [6 ]
Alwetaishi, Mamdooh [7 ]
Alahmadi, Ahmad Aziz [8 ]
机构
[1] Visvesvaraya Technol Univ, BGS Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Bengaluru 560086, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Technol & Appl Sci, Coll Engn & Technol, Engn Dept, Musandam, Oman
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Mech Engn Fac, Dept Mech Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Duzce Univ, Duzce Vocat Sch, Dept Elect & Energy, TR-81010 Duzce, Turkiye
[5] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Architecture Engn, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[7] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[8] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Pebbles; Flat plate collector; Heat gain enhancement; Thermal efficiency; CFD; ABSORBER PLATE; AIR HEATER; WATER; ENERGY; STILL; STORAGE; SYSTEM; ROUNDNESS; EXERGY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24218
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this work, pebbles of higher specific heat than the conventional absorber materials like aluminium or copper are proposed as a absorber in the solar flat plate collector. The proposed collector are integrated into the building design and constructed with masonry. Tests were conducted by varying the operating parameters which influence its performance, like the flow rate of the heat-absorbing medium, and the tilt of the collector using both coated and uncoated pebbles. The maximum temperature difference that could be measured for a conventional absorber was approximately 8 degrees C for a flow rate of 0.6 L/min. While for a coated and uncoated absorber, it was 7 degrees C and 5.5 degrees C respectively. This difference decreased with an increase in flow rates from 0.6 L/min to 1.2 L/min. For all the flow rates, it was observed that the average difference in efficiency between the coated and the conventional absorber collector is 5.82 %, while the difference between the coated and uncoated absorber collector is 15.68 %. Thus, it is very much evident that by replacing the conventional absorber with the proposed coated pebble absorber, the overall loss in efficiency is just 5.82 %, but the advantages are enormous. Along with the experimental study, numerical analysis was also carried out with CFD modeling. The numerical results agreed well with experimental results with the least error. Therefore, CFD simulation can be further used to optimize the design of the collector.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental and numerical analysis of thermal performance of shape stabilized PCM in a solar thermal collector
    Yeh, Chung-Yu
    Boonk, K. J. F.
    Sadeghi, Gholamabbas
    Mehrali, Mohammad
    Shahi, Mina
    Brem, Gerrit
    Mahmoudi, Amirhoushang
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 30
  • [2] An experimental and numerical approach for thermal performance investigation of solar flat plate collector
    Singh, Shiva
    Mausam, Kuwar
    Ghosh, Subrata Kumar
    Tiwari, Arun Kumar
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (40) : 92859 - 92879
  • [3] Experimental and numerical investigation on thermal performance of PV-driven aluminium honeycomb solar air collector
    Zhao, Yan
    Meng, Tian
    Jing, Chengjun
    Hu, Jiayu
    Qian, Siru
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 204 : 294 - 306
  • [4] An experimental and numerical approach for thermal performance investigation of solar flat plate collector
    Shiva Singh
    Kuwar Mausam
    Subrata Kumar Ghosh
    Arun Kumar Tiwari
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 92859 - 92879
  • [5] Comparative study of pebble absorber solar thermal collector (PASTC) with conventional absorber solar thermal collector (CASTC)
    Naik, N. Channa Keshava
    Shekar, K. S. Shashi
    Gautham, M. G.
    Prasad, T. B.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 46 : 2641 - 2646
  • [6] Experimental analysis on thermal performance of a solar air collector with a single pass
    Yang, Ming
    Wang, Pengsu
    Yang, Xudong
    Shan, Ming
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 56 : 361 - 369
  • [7] Numerical investigation of influence of the absorber shape on thermal performance of a solar collector
    Fattoum, Raoua
    Hidouri, Ammar
    Attia, Mohammed El Hadi
    Arici, Muslum
    Abbassi, Mohamed Ammar
    Driss, Zied
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2022, 147 (24) : 14697 - 14712
  • [8] Experimental study on thermal performance of reverse flow solar collector for dual heating applications
    Sharma, Sohan Lal
    Debbarma, Ajoy
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2024, 43 (06)
  • [9] Experimental and numerical investigation of volumetric versus surface solar absorbers for a concentrated solar thermal collector
    Li, Qiyuan
    Zheng, Cheng
    Mesgari, Sara
    Hewkuruppu, Yasitha L.
    Hjerrild, Natasha
    Crisostomo, Felipe
    Rosengarten, Gary
    Scott, Jason A.
    Taylor, Robert A.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2016, 136 : 349 - 364
  • [10] Experimental thermal performance and enviroeconomic analysis of serpentine flow channeled flat plate solar water collector
    Vengadesan, Elumalai
    Senthil, Ramalingam
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (12) : 17241 - 17259