Evaluation of life cycle assessment (LCA) use in geotechnical engineering

被引:4
作者
de Melo, Dora L. [1 ]
Kendall, Alissa [2 ]
DeJong, Jason T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY | 2024年 / 4卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
engineering sustainability; carbon footprint; environmental impacts; literature review; SUSTAINABILITY; BENEFITS; TUNNEL;
D O I
10.1088/2634-4505/ad2154
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis to incorporate sustainability metrics into geotechnical engineering design decisions, driven by the surging eco-consciousness of industry standards. Consequently, life cycle assessment (LCA) has emerged as a popular method for evaluating the environmental impacts of geotechnical systems or projects. This paper conducts a critical review of 54 publications that apply LCA to various geotechnical systems, including deep foundations, biogeotechnics, dams, ground improvement, earth retaining structures, tunnels, and others. This review assesses the current state of practice for LCA in geotechnical engineering, identifies common barriers to implementation, and provides suggestions for successful execution. While sustainability practices have been more readily adopted by some subdisciplines of civil engineering including structural and transportation, geotechnical engineering faces distinct challenges due to its inherent site-specific nature, characterized by non-homogeneous soils and the necessity for bespoke solutions. Despite the notable increase in geotechnical LCAs, the absence of uniform standards remains a critical issue. Many studies could be improved by enhancing transparency in reporting data and results, clearly justifying input assumptions, and assessing the effects of variable soil conditions. Geotechnical LCA studies often concentrate on highly specialized problems, limiting the relevance of findings to other projects and impeding the development of clear recommendations for industry practitioners. Future research endeavors would benefit from establishment of comprehensive frameworks and multi-indicator models tailored to geotechnical systems to more accurately capture expected environmental impacts and opportunities for their reduction. A standardized approach could reduce redundancy in studies, encourage knowledge transfer, and provide a basis for broader applicability of sustainability practices in the geotechnical engineering profession.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Alotaibi E., 2021, Life Cycle Assessment of Biocemented Sands Using Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) for Ground Improvement Applications, DOI [10.21203/rs.3.rs-862874/v1, DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-862874/V1]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, Biogeotechnics Bio mediated Processes and Bio Inspired Ideas for Geotechnical Engineering Innovation|National Academies
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [4] Life-cycle assessment applied to construction of Thames Tideway east tunnel, London, UK
    Arena, Noemi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 172 (08) : 416 - 423
  • [5] Arzoumanidis I., 2020, PERSPECTIVES SOCIAL, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-01508-4_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-01508]
  • [6] Ashfaq M, 2021, GEOTECH SP, V324, P213
  • [7] Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review
    Asiedu, Y
    Gu, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (04) : 883 - 908
  • [8] Applying multi-criteria decision-making on alternatives for earth-retaining walls: LCA, LCC, and S-LCA
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Marsono, Abdul Kadir Bin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (11) : 2140 - 2153
  • [9] Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: perspectives and review
    Basu, Dipanjan
    Misra, Aditi
    Puppala, Anand J.
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (01) : 96 - 113
  • [10] Berg R.R., 2009, DESIGN MECHANICALLY