Gaboxadol in angelman syndrome: A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 study

被引:6
|
作者
Keary, Christopher [1 ]
Bird, Lynne M. [2 ,3 ]
de Wit, Marie-Claire [4 ]
Hatti, Shivkumar [5 ]
Heimer, Gali [6 ]
Heussler, Helen [7 ,8 ]
Kolevzon, Alexander [9 ]
Mathews, Adera [10 ]
Ochoa-Lubinoff, Cesar [11 ]
Tan, Wen-Hann [12 ,13 ]
Yan, Ying [10 ]
Adams, Maxwell [10 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Rady Childrens Hosp, San Diego, CA USA
[4] ERN Ithaca Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, ENCORE Expertise Ctr, Dept Pediat Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Suburban Res Associates, Media, PA USA
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Sheba Med Ctr, Ramat Gan, Israel
[7] Univ Queensland, Ctr Child Hlth Res, Brisbane, Australia
[8] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Ctr Clin Trials Rare Neurodev Disorders, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[10] Ovid Therapeut, Cambridge, MA USA
[11] Rush Childrens Hosp, Chicago, IL USA
[12] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[13] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Gaboxadol; Angelman syndrome; Neuronal ubiquitin protein ligase E3A; THERAPIES; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.07.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of gaboxadol for treatment of children with Angelman syndrome (AS). Method: In this international, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomized children 4-12 years old with a molecular diagnosis of AS and a Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-severity score =3 to either daily administration of weight-based gaboxadol or matching placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the CGI-Improvement-AS (CGI-I-AS) score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of participants with CGI-I-AS response of =3 (i.e., at least "minimal improvement") and =2 (i.e., at least "much improvement") at week 12. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Weight based dosing of study drug ranged from 0.125 mg/kg to 0.24 mg/kg depending on weight range.Results: Between August 2019 and November 2020, 104 participants were enrolled: participants 4-12 years old were randomly (1:1) assigned to gaboxadol (n = 47) or placebo (n = 50), and 7 other participants 2-3 years old who received gaboxadol and were assessed for safety only. All gaboxadol-treated participants and 48 of 50 placebo-treated participants completed treatment. There was no significant difference in CGI-I-AS between groups: at week 12, mean CGI-I-AS score was 3.3 (SD, 1.00) and 3.2 (SD, 1.05) in the gaboxadol and placebo groups, respectively, yielding a least squares mean difference of zero (p = 0.83). There were no between-group significant differences with respect to CGI-I-AS responses. Gaboxadol was well tolerated in all age groups of this study.Conclusions: There was no significant difference in CGI-I-AS between gaboxadol and placebo after 12 weeks of study treatment in pediatric AS participants.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 12
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transdermal selegiline in major depression: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in outpatients
    Bodkin, JA
    Amsterdam, JD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159 (11): : 1869 - 1875
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of Dimdazenil in the adult insomnia patients: a phase II randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and parallel-group study
    Li, Yanpeng
    Zhang, Ruoxi
    Zhou, Yanling
    Bao, Cungang
    Lin, Zhaocun
    Chen, Chunyan
    He, Jingjing
    Jin, Zhiping
    Song, Lihua
    Zhang, Min
    Guo, Sigen
    Jiang, Yu
    Zhao, Zhongxin
    SLEEP, 2024, 47 (02)
  • [23] Fostamatinib for the treatment of Japanese patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: A phase 3, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study
    Kuwana, Masataka
    Ito, Tomoki
    Kowata, Shugo
    Hatta, Yoshihiro
    Fujimaki, Katsumichi
    Naito, Kensuke
    Kurahashi, Shingo
    Kagoo, Toshiya
    Tanimoto, Kazuki
    Saotome, So
    Tomiyama, Yoshiaki
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 200 (06) : 802 - 811
  • [24] Omega-3 supplementation in young offenders: a randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial
    Raine, Adrian
    Leung, Chi-Ching
    Singh, Melvinder
    Kaur, Jasmin
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2020, 16 (03) : 389 - 405
  • [25] Omega-3 supplementation in young offenders: a randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial
    Adrian Raine
    Chi-Ching Leung
    Melvinder Singh
    Jasmin Kaur
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2020, 16 : 389 - 405
  • [26] Nutritional Formulation for Patients with Angelman Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Exogenous Ketones
    Carson, Robert P.
    Herber, Donna L.
    Pan, Zhaoxing
    Phibbs, Fenna
    Key, Alexandra P.
    Gouelle, Arnaud
    Ergish, Patience
    Armour, Eric A.
    Patel, Shital
    Duis, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2021, 151 (12): : 3628 - 3636
  • [27] A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of Sativex, in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis
    Collin, C.
    Ehler, E.
    Waberzinek, G.
    Alsindi, Z.
    Davies, P.
    Powell, K.
    Notcutt, W.
    O'Leary, C.
    Ratcliffe, S.
    Novakova, I.
    Zapletalova, O.
    Pikova, J.
    Ambler, Z.
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 32 (05) : 451 - 459
  • [28] Gabapentin enacarbil in Japanese patients with restless legs syndrome: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
    Inoue, Yuichi
    Hirata, Koichi
    Uchimura, Naohisa
    Kuroda, Kenji
    Hattori, Nobutaka
    Takeuchi, Masahiro
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2013, 29 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of GQ-lab daily in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study
    Shin, C. M.
    Choi, Y. J.
    Yoon, H.
    Park, Y. S.
    Kim, N.
    Lee, D. H.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2019, 31
  • [30] The reduction impact of monoglucosyl rutin on abdominal visceral fat: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group
    Hashizume, Yushi
    Tandia, Mahamadou
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 85 (10) : 3577 - 3589