"They are my people, add them!" The politicisation of poverty reduction programmes in the Global South: Ghana's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty cash transfer programme in focus

被引:2
作者
Mohammed, Abdul-Rahim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dev Studies, Fac Sustainable Dev Studies, Dept Dev Management & Policy Studies, Tamale, Ghana
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT | 2024年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
Social protection; conditional cash transfers; politicisation; Ghana; Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP); QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; SOCIAL-POLICY; LATIN-AMERICA;
D O I
10.1080/02255189.2023.2249579
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Numerous impact assessments have shown that Ghana's cash transfer programme, the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP), has contributed to poverty alleviation and improved schooling. Although the LEAP programme has been extensively evaluated, its political dimensions have been under-researched. Within this context, the present article aimed at understanding the pathways of politicising the LEAP programme. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 25 LEAP beneficiaries and 5 programme officers, the data demonstrates how the political actors abuse the targeting system by prioritising "their people" at the expense of other beneficiaries in five districts of northern Ghana. De nombreuses etudes d'impact ont demonte que le programme de transferts monetaires du Ghana, le Programme de revenu de subsistance contre la pauvrete (LEAP), a contribue a attenuer la pauvrete et a ameliorer la scolarisation des enfants. Bien que le programme LEAP ait ete etudie de maniere extensive, ses dimensions politiques n'ont pas encore fait l'objet d'une analyse aussi poussee. Dans ce contexte, notre article a pour but d'etudier les differentes voies de politisation du programme LEAP. Nous basons notre analyse sur des entretiens semi-directifs avec 25 beneficiaires et 5 administrateurs du programme LEAP. Nos resultats demontrent la maniere dont les acteurs politiques abusent du systeme de ciblage du programme afin de donner la priorite a & DLANGBRAC; leurs gens & drangbrac;, au detriment d'autres beneficiaires dans les cinq districts du nord du Ghana.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 260
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] Bastagli F., 2009, 60 IPG INT POL CTR I
  • [12] The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia's Patronage Democracy
    Berenschot, Ward
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2018, 51 (12) : 1563 - 1593
  • [13] Bucheli Juan Fernando, 2015, anal.polit., V28, P19
  • [14] Cooke E., 2016, The Ghana Poverty and Inequality Report: Using the 6th Ghana Living Standards Survey '
  • [15] Determining validity in qualitative inquiry
    Creswell, JW
    Miller, DL
    [J]. THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2000, 39 (03) : 124 - 130
  • [16] Cuesta J., 2018, J INCOME DISTRIBUTIO, V26, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40357, DOI 10.25071/1874-6322.40357]
  • [17] Urban cash transfers and poverty in Ghana
    Cuesta, Jose
    Danquah, Michael
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 26 (01) : 133 - 155
  • [18] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [19] FAO/UNICEF, 2016, EVIDENCE ACTION STOR
  • [20] Fiszbein A., 2009, Policy Research Report