Waiting for a digital therapist: three challenges on the path to psychotherapy delivered by artificial intelligence

被引:24
作者
Grodniewicz, J. P. [1 ]
Hohol, Mateusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Copernicus Ctr Interdisciplinary Studies, Krakow, Poland
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
artificial intelligence; mental health chatbots; psychotherapy; therapeutic alliance; narrow vs; general AI; large language models; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT); conversational agents; SELF-DETERMINATION; COMMON FACTORS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190084
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Growing demand for broadly accessible mental health care, together with the rapid development of new technologies, trigger discussions about the feasibility of psychotherapeutic interventions based on interactions with Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI). Many authors argue that while currently available CAI can be a useful supplement for human-delivered psychotherapy, it is not yet capable of delivering fully fledged psychotherapy on its own. The goal of this paper is to investigate what are the most important obstacles on our way to developing CAI systems capable of delivering psychotherapy in the future. To this end, we formulate and discuss three challenges central to this quest. Firstly, we might not be able to develop effective AI-based psychotherapy unless we deepen our understanding of what makes human-delivered psychotherapy effective. Secondly, assuming that it requires building a therapeutic relationship, it is not clear whether psychotherapy can be delivered by non-human agents. Thirdly, conducting psychotherapy might be a problem too complicated for narrow AI, i.e., AI proficient in dealing with only relatively simple and well-delineated tasks. If this is the case, we should not expect CAI to be capable of delivering fully-fledged psychotherapy until the so-called "general" or "human-like" AI is developed. While we believe that all these challenges can ultimately be overcome, we think that being mindful of them is crucial to ensure well-balanced and steady progress on our path to AI-based psychotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 138 条
  • [51] Fluckiger C., 2019, Psychotherapy relationships that work, P24, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190843953.003.0002
  • [52] Frank JD., 1991, PERSUASION HEALING C, V18
  • [53] Agents of change: Understanding the therapeutic processes associated with the helpfulness of therapy for mental health problems with relational agent MYLO
    Gaffney, Hannah
    Mansell, Warren
    Tai, Sara
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 6
  • [54] Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review
    Gaffney, Hannah
    Mansell, Warren
    Tai, Sara
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 6 (10):
  • [55] Goldberg Simon B, 2022, PLOS Digit Health, V1, DOI 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000002
  • [56] TOWARD THE DELINEATION OF THERAPEUTIC CHANGE PRINCIPLES
    GOLDFRIED, MR
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (11) : 991 - 999
  • [57] Goldman A., 2019, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
  • [58] Social Robots for People with Aging and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Literature
    Gongora Alonso, Susel
    Hamrioui, Sofiane
    de la Torre Diez, Isabel
    Motta Cruz, Eduardo
    Lopez-Coronado, Miguel
    Franco, Manuel
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2019, 25 (07) : 533 - 540
  • [59] Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: an Overview
    Graham, Sarah
    Depp, Colin
    Lee, Ellen E.
    Nebeker, Camille
    Tu, Xin
    Kim, Ho-Cheol
    Jeste, Dilip V.
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [60] Therapeutic Conversational Artificial Intelligence and the Acquisition of Self-understanding
    Grodniewicz, J. P.
    Hohol, Mateusz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (05) : 59 - 61