Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Flemban, Arwa F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Umm Al Qura Univ, Fac Med, Pathol Dept, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; meta-analysis; overdiagnosis; screening; OVER-DIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW-UP; RISK; MORTALITY; TIME; BENEFITS; SERVICE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/jpm13030523
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence of overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for breast cancer among women aged 40 years and older. A PRISMA systematic search appraisal and meta-analysis were conducted. A systematic literature search of English publications in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted without regard to the region or time period. Generic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted from the eligible studies. A meta-analysis was completed by utilizing comprehensive meta-analysis software. The effect size estimates were calculated using the fail-safe N test. The funnel plot and the Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests were employed to find any potential bias among the included articles. The strength of the association between two variables was assessed using Kendall's tau. Heterogeneity was measured using the I-squared (I2) test. The literature search in the five databases yielded a total of 4214 studies. Of those, 30 articles were included in the final analysis, with sample sizes ranging from 451 to 1,429,890 women. The vast majority of the articles were retrospective cohort designs (24 articles). The age of the recruited women ranged between 40 and 89 years old. The incidence of overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for breast cancer among women aged 40 years and older was 12.6%. There was high heterogeneity among the study articles (I2 = 99.993), and the pooled event rate was 0.126 (95% CI: 15 0.101-0.156). Despite the random-effects meta-analysis showing a high degree of heterogeneity among the articles, the screening tests have to allow for a certain degree of overdiagnosis (12.6%) due to screening mammography for breast cancer among women aged 40 years and older. Furthermore, efforts should be directed toward controlling and minimizing the harmful consequences associated with breast cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research [J].
Armijo-Olivo, Susan ;
Stiles, Carla R. ;
Hagen, Neil A. ;
Biondo, Patricia D. ;
Cummings, Greta G. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) :12-18
[2]   Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Boniol, Magali ;
Koechlin, Alice ;
Pizot, Cecile ;
Boniol, Mathieu .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359 :j5224
[3]   Advanced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Mortality in Randomized Controlled Trials on Mammography Screening [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Hery, Clarisse ;
Haukka, Jari ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
Byrnes, Graham .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (35) :5919-5923
[4]   Revised estimates of overdiagnosis from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study [J].
Baines, Cornelia J. ;
To, Teresa ;
Miller, Anthony B. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 90 :66-71
[5]   Estimates of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to population-based mammography screening in South Australia after adjustment for lead time effects [J].
Beckmann, Kerri ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Lynch, John ;
Hiller, Janet ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Roder, David .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2015, 22 (03) :127-135
[6]   A novel case-control design to estimate the extent of over-diagnosis of breast cancer due to organised population-based mammography screening [J].
Beckmann, Kerri R. ;
Lynch, John W. ;
Hiller, Janet E. ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Roder, David M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (06) :1411-1421
[7]   Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review [J].
Biesheuvel, Corne ;
Barratt, Alexandra ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Irwig, Les .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) :1129-1138
[8]   A case-control study to evaluate the impact of the breast screening programme on breast cancer incidence in England [J].
Blyuss, Oleg ;
Dibden, Amanda ;
Massat, Nathalie J. ;
Parmar, Dharmishta ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Sasieni, Peter .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02) :1878-1887
[9]   Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn't [J].
Brodersen, John ;
Schwartz, Lisa M. ;
Heneghan, Carl ;
O'Sullivan, Jack William ;
Aronson, Jeffrey K. ;
Woloshin, Steven .
BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2018, 23 (01) :1-3
[10]   Why Does Cancer Screening Persist Despite the Potential to Harm? [J].
Carter, Stacy M. .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (01) :24-40