Determination of static and dynamic fracture initiation toughness and numerical simulation of dynamic 3-point bend experiments of Al6063-T6

被引:9
作者
Pandouria, Anoop Kumar [1 ]
Kumar, Sanjay [2 ]
Tiwari, Vikrant [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Delhi Technol Univ, Delhi 110042, India
关键词
SFIT; DFIT; Stress intensity factor; MHPB; 3D-DIC; LPD; Crack initiation time; STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR; PREDICTION; ALUMINUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mechrescom.2023.104070
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The objective of this research is to find out the static and dynamic fracture initiation toughness of aluminium alloy Al6063-T6. An in-house modified Hopkinson Pressure Bar (MHPB) along with the digital image correlation (DIC) system has been used for 3-point bend experiments under dynamic loadings. However, conventional UTM has been used for quasi-static experiments. Dynamic experiments have been performed at different projectile velocities of 13.37, 14.23, 15.95, and 20.09 m/s, while quasi-static experiments have been performed at a 1 mm/ min displacement rate. Dynamic force is calculated by using strain gauge measurement at two-point on the bar while the crack initiation time is calculated using combined results from strain gauge and digital image corre-lation. Experimental results found that the value of dynamic fracture initiation toughness (DFIT) is higher as compared to static fracture initiation toughness (SFIT). However, DFIT has continuously increased with increasing loading rates. A numerical simulation of pre notched specimen under 3-point bend dynamic loading has been performed in ABAQUS software using the J-C constitutive and fracture model. Simulation results were compared with the experimental results and found good agreement in both these results.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ASTM International, 1991, E39990 ASTM, P1
  • [2] DYNAMIC FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS DETERMINED FROM LOAD-POINT DISPLACEMENT
    BACON, C
    FARM, J
    LATAILLADE, JL
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1994, 34 (03) : 217 - 223
  • [3] STRAIN-GAGE METHODS FOR MEASURING THE OPENING-MODE STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR, KI
    DALLY, JW
    SANFORD, RJ
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1987, 27 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [4] Prediction model, simulation, and experimental validation on thrust force and torque in drilling SiCp/Al6063
    Dou, Teng
    Fu, Hongge
    Li, Zhonglei
    Ji, Xu
    Bi, ShanShan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 103 (1-4) : 165 - 175
  • [5] Dynamic fracture toughness of a high strength armor steel
    Galvez, F.
    Cendon, D.
    Garcia, N.
    Enfedaque, A.
    Sanchez-Galvez, V.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2009, 16 (08) : 2567 - 2575
  • [6] Griffith A.A.V.I., 1921, PHIL T ROY SOC LOND, V221, P163, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTA.1921.0006
  • [7] Stress intensity factor, compliance and CMOD for a general three-point-bend beam
    Guinea, GV
    Pastor, JY
    Planas, J
    Elices, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1998, 89 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [8] STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF MULTILAYERED ALUMINUM AND STEEL SPECIMENS SUBJECTED TO HIGH STRAIN RATE LOADING CONDITIONS
    Iqbal, Danish
    Tiwari, Vikrant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS, 2018, 56 (04) : 1139 - 1151
  • [9] Irwin G.R., 1957, J. Appl. Mech, V24, P361, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.4011547
  • [10] Jiang FC, 2004, ENG FRACT MECH, V71, P279, DOI [10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00139-5, 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00139-5]