共 50 条
Clinical efficacy and safety of cannabidiol for pediatric refractory epilepsy indications: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:28
|作者:
Talwar, Ashna
[1
,2
]
Estes, Emily
[1
,3
]
Aparasu, Rajender
[2
]
Reddy, Doodipala Samba
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Texas A&M Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Bryan, TX USA
[2] Univ Houston, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Outcomes & Policy, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr Paso, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Inst Pharmacol & Neurotherapeut, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, 8447 State Highway 47, Bryan, TX 77807 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Cannabidiol;
CBD;
Clobazam;
Epilepsy syndrome;
Refractory seizures;
Pediatric epilepsy;
ANTISEIZURE MEDICATIONS;
SEX-DIFFERENCES;
SEIZURES;
CLOBAZAM;
THERAPY;
CANNABINOIDS;
CHILDREN;
TRIAL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114238
中图分类号:
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号:
071006 ;
摘要:
Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay for the treatment of seizure disorders. However, about one-third of people with epilepsy remain refractory to current ASMs. Cannabidiol (CBD) has recently been approved as ASM for three refractory epilepsy syndrome indications in children and adults. In this study, we evaluated the overall clinical potential of an oral CBD to treat refractory epilepsy in patients with Dravet syn-drome (DS), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of databases was conducted, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of CBD in epilepsy patients. The review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review focused on RCTs involving patients receiving highly purified oral CBD (Epidiolex, 10 to 50 mg/kg/day) for up to 16 weeks. A subgroup analysis by syndrome and CBD with or without concomitant clobazam was conducted. The key outcomes were reduction in seizure frequency, differences in 50% responder rates, adverse events, and interactions with clo-bazam as co-therapy. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Of 1183 articles screened, we included 6 RCTs meeting our eligibility criteria. All studies were considered to have a low risk of bias. In the pooled analysis, CBD treatment was found to be more efficacious compared to placebo (OR = 2.45, 95% CI =1.81-3.32, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis by syndrome demonstrated the odds of >= 50% reduction in seizures with CBD treatment in patients with DS (OR = 2.26, 95% CI:1.38-3.70), LGS (OR = 2.98, 95% CI:1.83-4.85) and TSC (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.06-3.76). Compared with placebo, CBD was associated with increased adverse events (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.33-2.46) such as diarrhea, somnolence, and sedation, and any serious adverse events (OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.63-5.05). Other factors, including dosage and clobazam co -therapy, were significantly associated with a greater effect on seizure control and side effects of CBD. In conclusion, the study shows that CBD is highly efficacious both as standalone and adjunct therapy with clobazam for controlling seizures in DS, LGS, and TSC conditions while limiting side effects. Further pharmacodynamic investigation of CBD actions, drug interaction assessments, and therapeutic management guidelines are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文