Environmental impacts management of grain and sweet maize through life cycle assessment in Sao Paulo, Brazil

被引:3
|
作者
Giusti, G. [1 ]
de Almeida, G. F. [2 ]
de Apresentacao, M. J. de F. [1 ]
Galvao, L. S. [1 ]
Knudsen, M. T. [3 ]
Djomo, S. N. [4 ]
Silva, D. A. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Res Grp Sustainabil Engn, Joao Leme Dos Santos Highway,SP-264,Km 110, BR-18052780 Itinga, Sorocaba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Nat Sci, Lagoa do Sino Campus, BR-18290000 Aracacu, Buri, Brazil
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Blichers Alle 20,POB 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[4] Unilasalle, Cyclann Grp, F-35170 Bruz, France
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Agriculture; Environmental impacts management; Life cycle assessment; Maize production; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY; WHEAT; CULTIVATION; PROVINCE; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-022-04418-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Maize is the second most produced food commodity in the world. Brazil is the world's third largest producer of maize, and the state of Sao Paulo is one of the major maize producers in Brazil. This study uses life cycle assessment to quantify and compare the environmental impacts to produce one ton of grain and sweet maize in the southwest of Sao Paulo state, from cradle-to-storage at seaport boundaries. The life cycle inventory was elaborated for the 2016-2017 harvest season. Environmental impacts were assessed using the CML 2015 impact assessment method. Three other methods were tested in sensitivity analysis. Results showed impacts of 203 kg CO2 eq. for global warming, 0.55 kg SO2 eq. for acidification, 0.53 kg PO4 eq. for eutrophication, 1197 MJ for abiotic depletion, and 962 kg DCB eq. for freshwater ecotoxicity, per ton of grain maize. A comparison of grain with sweet maize showed that the latter had lower environmental impacts if consumed at Sao Paulo megacity. Improvements are necessary for the systems and can be achieved by minimizing or substituting the most impactful flows (i.e., hotspots), which were fertilizers (for global warming and eutrophication), pesticides (for freshwater ecotoxicity), and transport activities (for abiotic depletion and acidification). Sensitivity analysis showed that a reduction of 20% in the transport process affected most the results. Transport activities can thus be an important opportunity to improve the environmental impacts of these systems and are also an incentive for producers to explore local market.
引用
收藏
页码:6559 / 6574
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimation of environmental impacts of roads through life cycle assessment: A critical review and future directions
    Jiang, Rui
    Wu, Peng
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 77 : 148 - 163
  • [42] Environmental Impacts Associated with Intensive Production in Pig Farms in Mexico through Life Cycle Assessment
    Rafael Giraldi-Diaz, Mario
    Castillo-Gonzalez, Eduardo
    De Medina-Salas, Lorena
    Velasquez-De la Cruz, Raul
    Daniel Huerta-Silva, Hector
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [43] Assessment of the environmental impacts of soybean production within fields in Madhya Pradesh: a life cycle analysis approach
    Khangar, Nihal Singh
    Thangavel, Mohanasundari
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, : 688 - 701
  • [44] Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event
    Toniolo, Sara
    Mazzi, Anna
    Fedele, Andrea
    Aguiari, Filippo
    Scipioni, Antonio
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 : 12 - 22
  • [45] Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability
    Ometto, Aldo
    Batistella, Mateus
    Guelere Filho, Americo
    Chuzel, Gerard
    Viau, Alain
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: COLLABORATION, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 673 - +
  • [46] A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA
    Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe
    Battagliese, Thomas
    Stackhouse-Lawson, Kimberly R.
    Rotz, C. Alan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (03) : 441 - 455
  • [47] Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China
    Li, Ziyue
    Chen, Yongliang
    Meng, Fanlei
    Shao, Qi
    Heal, Mathew R.
    Ren, Fengling
    Tang, Aohan
    Wu, Jiechen
    Liu, Xuejun
    Cui, Zhenling
    Xu, Wen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (38) : 57190 - 57203
  • [48] Is Integrated Weed Management efficient for reducing environmental impacts of cropping systems? A case study based on life cycle assessment
    Deytieux, Violaine
    Nemecek, Thomas
    Knuchel, Ruth Freiermuth
    Gaillard, Gerard
    Munier-Jolain, Nicolas M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 36 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [49] Environmental impact of beef production in Mexico through life cycle assessment
    Rivera Huerta, Adriana
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Rubio Lozano, Maria de la Salud
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 109 : 44 - 53
  • [50] Evaluating the impacts of different wheat farming systems through Life Cycle Assessment
    di Cristofaro, Marco
    Marino, Stefano
    Lima, Giuseppe
    Mastronardi, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436