Environmental impacts management of grain and sweet maize through life cycle assessment in Sao Paulo, Brazil

被引:3
|
作者
Giusti, G. [1 ]
de Almeida, G. F. [2 ]
de Apresentacao, M. J. de F. [1 ]
Galvao, L. S. [1 ]
Knudsen, M. T. [3 ]
Djomo, S. N. [4 ]
Silva, D. A. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Res Grp Sustainabil Engn, Joao Leme Dos Santos Highway,SP-264,Km 110, BR-18052780 Itinga, Sorocaba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Nat Sci, Lagoa do Sino Campus, BR-18290000 Aracacu, Buri, Brazil
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Blichers Alle 20,POB 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[4] Unilasalle, Cyclann Grp, F-35170 Bruz, France
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Agriculture; Environmental impacts management; Life cycle assessment; Maize production; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY; WHEAT; CULTIVATION; PROVINCE; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-022-04418-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Maize is the second most produced food commodity in the world. Brazil is the world's third largest producer of maize, and the state of Sao Paulo is one of the major maize producers in Brazil. This study uses life cycle assessment to quantify and compare the environmental impacts to produce one ton of grain and sweet maize in the southwest of Sao Paulo state, from cradle-to-storage at seaport boundaries. The life cycle inventory was elaborated for the 2016-2017 harvest season. Environmental impacts were assessed using the CML 2015 impact assessment method. Three other methods were tested in sensitivity analysis. Results showed impacts of 203 kg CO2 eq. for global warming, 0.55 kg SO2 eq. for acidification, 0.53 kg PO4 eq. for eutrophication, 1197 MJ for abiotic depletion, and 962 kg DCB eq. for freshwater ecotoxicity, per ton of grain maize. A comparison of grain with sweet maize showed that the latter had lower environmental impacts if consumed at Sao Paulo megacity. Improvements are necessary for the systems and can be achieved by minimizing or substituting the most impactful flows (i.e., hotspots), which were fertilizers (for global warming and eutrophication), pesticides (for freshwater ecotoxicity), and transport activities (for abiotic depletion and acidification). Sensitivity analysis showed that a reduction of 20% in the transport process affected most the results. Transport activities can thus be an important opportunity to improve the environmental impacts of these systems and are also an incentive for producers to explore local market.
引用
收藏
页码:6559 / 6574
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF GRAIN MAIZE IN INTENSIVE, CONVENTIONAL CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEM
    Holka, Malgorzata
    Bienkowski, Jerzy Franciszek
    Jankowiak, Janusz
    Dabrowicz, Radoslaw
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2017, 34 : 301 - 310
  • [22] Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production and Packing of Persian Lemon in Mexico through Life-Cycle Assessment
    Castillo-Gonzalez, Eduardo
    De Medina-Salas, Lorena
    Giraldi-Diaz, Mario Rafael
    Velasquez-De La Cruz, Raul
    Jimenez-Ochoa, Jose Rafael
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 6 (02): : 551 - 571
  • [23] Integrating Protein Quality and Quantity with Environmental Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment
    Berardy, Andrew
    Johnston, Carol S.
    Plukis, Alexandra
    Vizcaino, Maricarmen
    Wharton, Christopher
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance
    Morales, Marjorie
    Quintero, Julian
    Conejeros, Raul
    Aroca, German
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 : 1349 - 1361
  • [25] Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses
    Cuellar-Franca, Rosa M.
    Azapagic, Adisa
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 54 : 86 - 99
  • [26] Modeling the environmental and social impacts of the handloom industry in Bangladesh through life cycle assessment
    Mahiat, Tashfia
    Al Alam, Md Asef
    Argho, Maxim
    Corlett, Jackie
    Chowdhury, Rubel Biswas
    Biswas, Karabi Farhana
    Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf
    Sujauddin, Mohammad
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9 (01) : 239 - 252
  • [27] Use of life cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts associated with the management of sludge and biogas
    do Amaral, Karina Cubas
    Aisse, Miguel Mansur
    Collere Possetti, Gustavo Rafael
    Prado, Marcelo Real
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 77 (09) : 2292 - 2300
  • [28] Environmental and financial impacts of perioperative paracetamol use: a multicentre international life-cycle assessment
    Davies, Jessica F.
    McAlister, Scott
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    McGain, Forbes
    Seglenieks, Richard
    Gutman, Elena N.
    Groome, Jonathan
    Palipane, Natasha
    Latoff, Katherine
    Nielsen, Dominic
    Sherman, Jodi D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (06) : 1439 - 1448
  • [29] Floating wind power in deep-sea area: Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts
    Yuan, Weiyu
    Feng, Jing-Chun
    Zhang, Si
    Sun, Liwei
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Sheng, Songwei
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 9
  • [30] Applying life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental impacts of a PV-CSP hybrid system
    Qi, Xiaoyan
    Yao, Xilong
    Guo, Pibin
    Han, Yunfei
    Liu, Lin
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 227