Knowledge-Intensive HRM Systems and Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Teams: Mediating Role of Team Knowledge Processes

被引:9
作者
Shahzad, Khuram [1 ]
Hong, Ying [2 ]
Jiang, Yuan [3 ]
Niaz, Hina [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Management & Technol, Dr Hasan Murad Sch Management, C2 Johar Town, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[2] Fordham Univ, Gabelli Sch Business, New York, NY 10023 USA
[3] China Europe Int Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Huddersfield, Huddersfield Business Sch, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
human resource management systems; knowledge-intensive teams; knowledge exploration; knowledge exploitation; team performance; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WORK SYSTEMS; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATING KNOWLEDGE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; MODERATING ROLES; FIRM PERFORMANCE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION;
D O I
10.1177/10596011211063667
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether and how knowledge-intensive HRM systems (KIHRS) impact the performance of knowledge-intensive teams (KITs). We integrate the ability-motivation-opportunity theory with the knowledge management literature to hypothesize that KIHRS affect KIT performance through team knowledge exploration and knowledge exploitation processes. A total of 543 responses (408 team members and 135 team leaders) from 135 KIT of 119 firms were collected in two waves with a time lag of 3 months. The findings indicate that KIHRS relate positively to KIT performance. Furthermore, team knowledge exploration and knowledge exploitation work in a sequence to mediate the relationship between KIHRS and KIT performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1466
页数:37
相关论文
共 142 条
[71]   Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation [J].
Kianto, Aino ;
Saenz, Josune ;
Aramburu, Nekane .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 81 :11-20
[72]   Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance [J].
Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C. ;
Bozionelos, Nikos .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 36 (03) :385-415
[73]   HRM SYSTEMS FOR KNOWLEDGE WORKERS: DIFFERENCES AMONG TOP MANAGERS, MIDDLE MANAGERS, AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES [J].
Krausert, Achim .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (01) :67-87
[74]  
Laursen K., 2001, Journal of Management and Governance, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1017985623502
[75]   Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations [J].
Lavie, Dovev ;
Stettner, Uriel ;
Tushman, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2010, 4 :109-155
[76]   Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement [J].
LeBreton, James M. ;
Senter, Jenell L. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (04) :815-852
[77]   CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES - A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
LEONARDBARTON, D .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1992, 13 :111-125
[78]  
Lepak DP, 2006, RES PERS H, V25, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0742-7301(06)25006-0
[79]   The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development [J].
Lepak, DP ;
Snell, SA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (01) :31-48
[80]   Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations [J].
Lepak, DP ;
Snell, SA .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 28 (04) :517-543