共 50 条
Characteristics of Transport of Ill Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department
被引:1
作者:
Yock-Corrales, Adriana
[1
]
Curto, Danila Andrea
[2
]
Gerolami, Andrea
[3
]
Mota, Cesar
[4
]
Vigna, Andres
[5
]
Camacho, Edgardo
[6
]
Gonzalez-Vallejos, Silvia Catalina
[7
]
Copana-Olmos, Raul
[8
]
Gomez-Vargas, Jessica
[1
]
Casson, Nils
[9
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Nacl Ninos Dr Carlos Saenz Herrera, CCSS, Emergency Dept, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Hosp Prof Dr JP Garrahan, Emergency Dept, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Ctr Hosp Pereira Rossell, Emergency Dept, Montevideo, Uruguay
[4] Hosp Infantil Dr Robert Reid Cabral, Emergency Dept, Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
[5] Ctr Hosp Pereira Rossell, Dept Neonatol, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Asociac Med San Jose, Montevideo, Uruguay
[6] Hosp Materno Infantil, Emergency Dept, Salta, Argentina
[7] Hosp Gen Pediatr Ninos Acosta Nu, Emergency Dept, Asuncion, Paraguay
[8] Hosp Ninos Manuel Ascencio Villaroel, Cochabamba, Bolivia
[9] Hosp San Juan Dios, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Tarija, Bolivia
关键词:
transport;
critically ill;
Latin America;
INTERHOSPITAL TRANSPORT;
ADVERSE EVENTS;
CRITICAL-CARE;
CHILDREN;
D O I:
10.1097/PEC.0000000000002981
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
ObjectiveThe aim was to describe the characteristics of the transport system of critically ill pediatric patients in the emergency departments (EDs) in Latin America (LA).MethodologyThis is a prospective cross-sectional study in a 1-year period. Patients were recruited on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 of each month in the EDs in LA. We included ill-pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years. Patients who needed transfer for a diagnostic study, with arrival mode not by ambulance, or with the impossibility of interviewing the transfer team were excluded from the study.ResultsA total of 389 patients were included in the study. The majority were males (57%) with a median age of 49 months (interquartile range, 10-116). Thirty-three percent (129) of transfers had the participation of a coordinating center; 97.1% (375) were carried out by road ambulance, and 84.3% (323) were interhospital transfers, with a mean distance traveled of 83.2 km (SD, 105 km). The main reason for transfer in 88.17% (343) was the need for a more complex health center. The main diagnosis was respiratory distress (71; 18.2%), acute abdomen (70; 18%), Traumatic Brain Injury (33; 8.48%), multiple trauma (32; 8.23%), septic shock (31; 7.9%), and COVID-19-related illness (19; 4.8%). A total of 296 (76.5%) patients had peripheral vascular access, and 171 (44%) patients had oxygen support with 49 (28.6%) having invasive ventilation; the most frequent monitoring method (67.8%) was pulse oximetry, and 83.4% (313) did not record adverse events. Regarding the transfer team, 88% (342) had no specialized personnel, and only 62.4% (243) had a physician on their teams.ConclusionsIn LA, there is great variability in personnel training, equipment for pediatric transport, team composition, and characterization of critical care transport systems. Continued efforts to improve conditions in our countries may help reduce patient morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 273
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条