The impact of carbon trading on the "quantity" and "quality" of green technology innovation: A dynamic QCA analysis based on carbon trading pilot areas

被引:9
作者
Chang, Haodong [1 ]
Zhao, Yipeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Math & Phys, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Management Sci, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon trading price; Scale of the carbon trading market; Green technology innovation; Dynamic QCA; Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test; Configuration effects; Regional differences; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; EMISSIONS; DIFFUSION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25668
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To study the multi-factor linkage effect of carbon trading on green technology innovation, this paper employs the dynamic QCA analysis method and uses panel data from China's carbon trading pilot areas. The aim is to explore the causal path considering the time effect. Additionally, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test is applied to investigate the provincial coverage difference of the configuration and reveal the variation in configuration preferences between regions from a spatial dimension. The results indicate that a single factor alone does not constitute the necessary conditions for the "quantity" and "quality" of high-green technology innovation. However, the necessity of carbon trading price exhibits a declining trend over the years, demonstrating the presence of a time effect. Regarding the sufficiency analysis of conditional configuration, it mainly includes a "price-market scale" dual effect model and a single market scale effect model, with three configuration paths for each model. Among them, the "price-market scale" dual effect model can drive the increase in the quantity of green technology innovation through carbon trading price, market scale, government intervention degree, and other factors. The single market scale effect model can promote the high-quality development of green technology innovation, but the impact of carbon trading price on the quality of green technology innovation is relatively insignificant. In terms of the time dimension, the three configurations still maintain good applicability to green technology innovation under normal conditions. However, when considering the spatial dimension, the coverage distribution of the three configurations exhibits evident regional differences. This study introduces the dynamic panel QCA method into the research field for the first time. It addresses the limitations of the traditional QCA method, which is constrained by cross-section data and lacks the ability to explore the linkage effect between factors over time. Additionally, the study analyzes the effects of carbon trading price and market size on the "quantity" and "quality" of green technology innovation, considering both time and space dimensions, from a configuration perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of the Impact of Carbon Finance on Digital Green Technology Innovation of Enterprises
    Zhao S.
    Hu P.
    Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [32] The Carbon Emissions Trading Policy of China: Does It Really Promote the Enterprises' Green Technology Innovations?
    Li, Xiaoqi
    Guo, Dingfei
    Feng, Chao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [33] Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve enterprise green innovation?
    Guo, Jiaqi
    Li, Changhong
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 69
  • [34] Carbon emission trading policy and corporate green innovation: internal incentives or external influences
    Wu, Siqi
    Qu, Yue
    Huang, Haigang
    Xia, Youfu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (11) : 31501 - 31523
  • [35] Heterogeneous impacts of carbon emission trading on green innovation: Firm-level in China
    Zhang, Haotian
    Sun, Xiumei
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Wang, Xueyang
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 35 (07) : 3504 - 3529
  • [36] Has the pilot carbon trading policy improved China's green total factor energy efficiency?
    Zhou, Chaobo
    Qi, Shaozhou
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114
  • [37] Does carbon trading mechanism improve the efficiency of green innovation? Evidence from China
    Bai, Yi-Xiang
    Wang, Chan
    Zeng, Min
    Chen, You-Hua
    Wen, Hong-Xing
    Nie, Pu-Yan
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 49
  • [38] Do carbon emission trading scheme policies induce green technology innovation? New evidence from provincial green patents in China
    Fu, Lina
    Yi, Yang
    Wu, Ting
    Cheng, Ruiwen
    Zhang, Zuoming
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 13342 - 13358
  • [39] Do carbon emission trading scheme policies induce green technology innovation? New evidence from provincial green patents in China
    Lina Fu
    Yang Yi
    Ting Wu
    Ruiwen Cheng
    Zuoming Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 (5) : 13342 - 13358
  • [40] Impact of government subsidies on the innovation performance of the photovoltaic industry: Based on the moderating effect of carbon trading prices
    Xu, Xiaofeng
    Cui, Xiaodan
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Zhou, Yichen
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 170