Quantum information criteria for model selection in quantum state estimation

被引:1
作者
Yano, Hiroshi [1 ]
Yamamoto, Naoki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Appl Phys & Phys Informat, Hiyoshi 3-14-1, Kohoku, Yokohama 2238522, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Quantum Comp Ctr, Hiyoshi 3-14-1, Kohoku, Yokohama, Japan
关键词
quantum information; quantum state estimation; model selection;
D O I
10.1088/1751-8121/acf747
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum state estimation (or state tomography) is an indispensable task in quantum information processing. Because full state tomography that determines all elements of the density matrix is computationally demanding, one usually takes the strategy of assuming a certain model of quantum states and identifying the model parameters. However, it is difficult to make a valid assumption given little prior knowledge on a quantum state of interest, and thus we need a reasonable model selection method for quantum state estimation. Actually, in the classical statistical estimation theory, several types of information criteria have been established and widely used in practice for appropriately choosing a classical statistical model. In this study, we propose quantum information criteria for evaluating the quality of the estimated quantum state in terms of the quantum relative entropy, which is a natural quantum analogue of the classical information criterion defined in terms of Kullback-Leibler divergence. In particular, we derive two quantum information criteria depending on the type of an estimator for the quantum relative entropy; one uses the log-likelihood and the other uses the classical shadow. The general role of information criteria is to predict the performance of an estimated model for unseen data, although it is a function of only sampled data; this generalization capability of the proposed quantum information criteria is evaluated in numerical simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   NETWORK INFORMATION CRITERION - DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF HIDDEN UNITS FOR AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL [J].
MURATA, N ;
YOSHIZAWA, S ;
AMARI, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 5 (06) :865-872
[22]  
Onorati E, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2301.12946
[23]  
Paris MGA, 2004, LECT NOTES PHYS, V649, P1
[24]  
Parzen E., SELECTED PAPERS HIRO, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0]
[25]   Determining which quantum measurement performs better for state estimation [J].
Rehacek, Jaroslav ;
Teo, Yong Siah ;
Hradil, Zdenek .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2015, 92 (01)
[26]  
Rissanen J., 1998, Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry, DOI DOI 10.1142/0822
[27]  
Rouze C, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2107.03333
[28]  
Sbahi FM, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2206.04663
[29]   ESTIMATING DIMENSION OF A MODEL [J].
SCHWARZ, G .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1978, 6 (02) :461-464
[30]   Error models in quantum computation: An application of model selection [J].
Schwarz, Lucia ;
van Enk, S. J. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2013, 88 (03)