Data-driven static and dynamic resilience assessment of the global liner shipping network

被引:67
作者
Bai, Xiwen [1 ]
Ma, Zhongjun [1 ]
Zhou, Yaoming [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
AIS data; Global liner shipping network; Resilience; Network disintegration model; Knock -on effect; VULNERABILITY; ROBUSTNESS; INTERNET; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2023.103016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a critical infrastructure system of modern society, the global liner shipping network (GLSN) has become increasingly complex and thus vulnerable to disruptions. This study proposes a resilience assessment framework for the GLSN across two dimensions, including static resilience and dynamic resilience. First, by leveraging high-frequency vessel movement data, the GLSN is constructed. Then, with the clique percolation method (CPM), overlapping community structures and key nodes can be identified. The static resilience assessment is initially conducted using simulation techniques, with nodes attacked through pre-designed scenarios. Then, a network disintegration method is employed to consider the impact of traffic flow on system resilience assessment, which separates the weighted GLSN into different layers for evaluation. The results show that both overlapping community structure and traffic flow significantly impact the resilience evaluation of the GLSN. Finally, to assess the dynamic resilience of the GLSN, we propose an innovative, knock-on effect simulation model with tailored, locally weighted flow redistribution rules. It provides a method for predicting the impacts of potential global disruptions (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic) and critical maritime infrastructure failures (e.g., the Suez Canal obstruction) on the shipping network, which are of great concern not only to academia but also to industry.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, BBC News27 March
[2]   Maritime port network resiliency and reliability through co-opetition [J].
Asadabadi, Ali ;
Miller-Hooks, Elise .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 137
[3]   A destination choice model for very large gas carriers (VLGC) loading from the US Gulf [J].
Bai, Xiwen ;
Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee .
ENERGY, 2019, 174 :1267-1275
[4]   Resilience of public transport networks against attacks [J].
Berche, B. ;
von Ferber, C. ;
Holovatch, T. ;
Holovatch, Yu. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2009, 71 (01) :125-137
[5]   Vulnerability of international freight flows to shipping network disruptions: A multiplex network perspective [J].
Calatayud, Agustina ;
Mangan, John ;
Palacin, Roberto .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 108 :195-208
[6]   Network robustness and fragility: Percolation on random graphs [J].
Callaway, DS ;
Newman, MEJ ;
Strogatz, SH ;
Watts, DJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (25) :5468-5471
[7]   Defining and Enabling Resiliency of Electric Distribution Systems With Multiple Microgrids [J].
Chanda, Sayonsom ;
Srivastava, Anurag K. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2016, 7 (06) :2859-2868
[8]   Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network [J].
Chen, Hong ;
Cullinane, Kevin ;
Liu, Nan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 97 :282-301
[9]   An eigenvector centrality analysis of world container shipping network connectivity [J].
Cheung, Kam-Fung ;
Bell, Michael G. H. ;
Pan, Jing-Jing ;
Perera, Supun .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 140
[10]   Breakdown of the internet under intentional attack [J].
Cohen, R ;
Erez, K ;
ben-Avraham, D ;
Havlin, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 86 (16) :3682-3685