Optimal real-time pricing and electricity package by retail electric providers based on social learning

被引:17
作者
Fang, Debin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Pengyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
Real-time pricing; Electricity packages; Social learning; Reinforcement learning; RESIDENTIAL DEMAND; PUBLIC-POLICY; CONSUMERS; ELASTICITY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106442
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As the global retail electricity market liberalizes, retail electric providers (REPs) are optimizing pricing schemes and electricity packages (EPs) to meet consumers' individual and diverse electricity plans while reducing volatility risk and ensuring profitability. However, consumer social learning (SL) helps frequently adjust electricity plans as social media evolves, preventing REPs from accurately understanding consumer electricity demand. Therefore, this paper constructs a dynamic game model of the retail electricity market considering social learning. REPs announce price and electricity package information to consumers based on market information and historical experience, and consumers first shared electricity usage plans based on their willingness to learn and share information among themselves, and then respond to REPs based on current information and experience. The main findings of this paper are as follows: (i) social learning increases consumer utility, promotes competition, depresses REPs prices, shrinks price differentials, and induces concessions by REPs, but raises volatility risk. (ii) electricity packages combined with social learning can save electricity consumption and significantly reduce volatility risk. Finally, this paper uses Smart Meter Energy Consumption data in London households to demonstrate the impact of social learning and to provide decision support for REP's electricity sales strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   AN ADVERSE SELECTION APPROACH TO POWER PRICING [J].
Alasseur, Clemente ;
Ekeland, Ivar ;
Elie, Romuald ;
Santibanez, Nicolas Hernandez ;
Possamai, Dylan .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 58 (02) :686-713
[2]   Rethinking real-time electricity pricing [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) :820-842
[3]  
Borenstein S, 2005, RAND J ECON, V36, P469
[4]   The impacts of social learning on a real-time pricing scheme in the electricity market [J].
Cao, GangCheng ;
Fang, Debin ;
Wang, Pengyu .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 291
[5]  
Chao H, 2010, ELECT J, V23, P7, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2009.12.007
[6]   Electricity Price Forecasting for Operational Scheduling of Behind-the-Meter Storage Systems [J].
Chitsaz, Hamed ;
Zamani-Dehkordi, Payam ;
Zareipour, Hamidreza ;
Parikh, Palak P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (06) :6612-6622
[7]   THE THEORY OF PEAK-LOAD PRICING - A SURVEY [J].
CREW, MA ;
FERNANDO, CS ;
KLEINDORFER, PR .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1995, 8 (03) :215-248
[8]   Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village [J].
Darby, Sarah .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) :2929-2940
[9]   Flexible customer willingness to pay for bundled smart home energy products and services [J].
Daziano, Ricardo A. .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 61
[10]   Estimating residential demand for electricity in the United States, 1965-2006 [J].
Dergiades, Theologos ;
Tsoulfidis, Lefteris .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (05) :2722-2730