Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

被引:37
作者
Mottaran, Angelo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bravi, Carlo Andrea [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Sarchi, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Paciotti, Marco [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Nocera, Luigi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Piro, Adele [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Piazza, Pietro [1 ,3 ]
De Backer, Pieter [1 ]
Farinha, Rui [1 ]
De Groote, Ruben [2 ]
De Naeyer, Geert [2 ]
Mottrie, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ORSI Acad, Proefhoevestr 12, B-9090 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hosp, Dept Urol, Aalst, Belgium
[3] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Div Urol, Bologna, Italy
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, URI, Milan, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Humanitas Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Rozzano, Italy
[6] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Urol, Modena, Italy
关键词
apical; RALSC; pelvic organ prolapse; robotic sacropexy; robot-assisted sacral colpopexy; RSC; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ICS JOINT REPORT; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; FLOOR DISORDERS; TERMINOLOGY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2022.0495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Hypothesis: Robotic sacropexy (RSC) emerged in the last years as a valid alternative to the laparoscopic technique. However, the robotic approach is still limited by platform availability and concerns about cost-effectiveness. Recently, new robotic platforms joined the market, lowering the costs and offering the possibility to expand the robotic approach. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure with this new platform along with the description of our surgical setting.Materials and Methods: We reported data on the first five consecutive patients who underwent RSC at Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), performed with the novel HUGO (TM) Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System. The platform consists of four fully independent carts, an open console, and a system tower equipped for both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. We collected patients' characteristics, intraoperative data, intraoperative complications, and clashes of instruments.Results: All procedures were completed according to the same surgical setting and technique. No need for conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery and/or for additional port placement was required. No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or system failure that compromised the surgery's completion were recorded. Median interquartile range docking, operative, and console time were 8 (6-9), 130 (115-165), and 80 (80-115) minutes, respectively.Conclusion: This series represents the first worldwide report of a robot-assisted sacropexy executed with the novel HUGO RAS System. Awaiting future investigation, this preliminary experience provides relevant data in terms of operative room settings and perioperative outcomes that might be helpful for future adopters of this platform.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Maher Christopher, 2016, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V10, pCD012376
[12]   Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence [J].
Olsen, AL ;
Smith, VJ ;
Bergstrom, JO ;
Colling, JC ;
Clark, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :501-506
[13]   Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy [J].
Panico, Giovanni ;
Campagna, Giuseppe ;
Vacca, Lorenzo ;
Caramazza, Daniela ;
Iannone, Vito ;
Rossitto, Cristiano ;
Rumolo, Valerio ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Ercoli, Alfredo .
MINERVA MEDICA, 2021, 112 (04) :483-491
[14]   Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Surgical Technique and Outcomes at a Single High-volume Institution [J].
Ploumidis, Achilles ;
Spinoit, Anne-Francoise ;
De Naeyer, Geert ;
Schatteman, Peter ;
Gan, Melanie ;
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Volpe, Alessandro ;
Mottrie, Alexandre .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (01) :138-145
[15]   Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system [J].
Sarchi, Luca ;
Mottaran, Angelo ;
Bravi, Carlo Andrea ;
Paciotti, Marco ;
Farinha, Rui ;
Piazza, Pietro ;
Puliatti, Stefano ;
De Groote, Ruben ;
De Naeyer, Geert ;
Gallagher, Anthony ;
Breda, Alberto ;
Mottrie, Alexandre .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 130 (05) :671-675
[16]   Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Serati, Maurizio ;
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Sorice, Paola ;
Braga, Andrea ;
Torella, Marco ;
Salvatore, Stefano ;
Uccella, Stefano ;
Cromi, Antonella ;
Ghezzi, Fabio .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) :303-318
[17]   CURRENT STATUS OF ROBOTIC SURGERY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE [J].
Smith, Ariana L. ;
Raz, Shlomo .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (04) :448-450
[18]   Lifetime Risk of Undergoing Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse [J].
Smith, Fiona J. ;
Holman, C. D'Arcy J. ;
Moorin, Rachael E. ;
Tsokos, Nicolas .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (05) :1096-1100
[19]  
Toozs-Hobson P, 2012, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V31, P415, DOI [10.1002/nau.22238, 10.1007/s00192-012-1726-y]
[20]   Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis [J].
van Zanten, Femke ;
Koops, Steven E. Schraffordt ;
Pasker-De Jong, Pieternel C. M. ;
Lenters, Egbert ;
Schreuder, Henk W. R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (05) :483.e1-483.e11