Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

被引:31
作者
Mottaran, Angelo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bravi, Carlo Andrea [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Sarchi, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Paciotti, Marco [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Nocera, Luigi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Piro, Adele [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Piazza, Pietro [1 ,3 ]
De Backer, Pieter [1 ]
Farinha, Rui [1 ]
De Groote, Ruben [2 ]
De Naeyer, Geert [2 ]
Mottrie, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ORSI Acad, Proefhoevestr 12, B-9090 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hosp, Dept Urol, Aalst, Belgium
[3] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Div Urol, Bologna, Italy
[4] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, URI, Milan, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Humanitas Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Rozzano, Italy
[6] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Urol, Modena, Italy
关键词
apical; RALSC; pelvic organ prolapse; robotic sacropexy; robot-assisted sacral colpopexy; RSC; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ICS JOINT REPORT; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; FLOOR DISORDERS; TERMINOLOGY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2022.0495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Hypothesis: Robotic sacropexy (RSC) emerged in the last years as a valid alternative to the laparoscopic technique. However, the robotic approach is still limited by platform availability and concerns about cost-effectiveness. Recently, new robotic platforms joined the market, lowering the costs and offering the possibility to expand the robotic approach. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the technical feasibility and safety of the procedure with this new platform along with the description of our surgical setting.Materials and Methods: We reported data on the first five consecutive patients who underwent RSC at Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), performed with the novel HUGO (TM) Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System. The platform consists of four fully independent carts, an open console, and a system tower equipped for both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. We collected patients' characteristics, intraoperative data, intraoperative complications, and clashes of instruments.Results: All procedures were completed according to the same surgical setting and technique. No need for conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery and/or for additional port placement was required. No intraoperative complications, instrument clashes, or system failure that compromised the surgery's completion were recorded. Median interquartile range docking, operative, and console time were 8 (6-9), 130 (115-165), and 80 (80-115) minutes, respectively.Conclusion: This series represents the first worldwide report of a robot-assisted sacropexy executed with the novel HUGO RAS System. Awaiting future investigation, this preliminary experience provides relevant data in terms of operative room settings and perioperative outcomes that might be helpful for future adopters of this platform.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative analysis of the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment
    Ruvolo, Claudia Colla
    Afonina, Margarita
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Paciotti, Marco
    Piro, Adele
    Piramide, Federico
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Lores, Maria Peraire
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Belmonte, Mario
    Rebuffo, Silvia
    Ticonosco, Marco
    Frego, Nicola
    Gaia, Giorgia
    De Groote, Ruben
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    De Naeyer, Geert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [2] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: initial experience of a tertiary center with a high background in extraperitoneal laparoscopy surgery
    Marques-Monteiro, Miguel
    Teixeira, Bernardo
    Mendes, Goncalo
    Rocha, Alexandra
    Madanelo, Mariana
    Mesquita, Sofia
    Vital, Joao
    Vinagre, Nuno
    Magalhaes, Martinha
    Oliveira, Beatriz
    Carneiro, Diogo
    Soares, Jose
    Cabral, Joao
    Teves, Frederico
    Fraga, Avelino
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (10) : 2671 - 2677
  • [3] Robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience from a tertiary referral center
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Sforza, Simone
    Mari, Andrea
    Morselli, Simone
    Tellini, Riccardo
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Vignolini, Graziano
    Serni, Sergio
    Carini, Marco
    Minervini, Andrea
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [4] Three-arms off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the new Hugo robot-assisted surgery system
    Prata, Francesco
    Ragusa, Alberto
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Iannuzzi, Andrea
    Tedesco, Francesco
    Cacciatore, Loris
    Civitella, Angelo
    Tuzzolo, Piergiorgio
    Cirillo, Roberto
    Calle, Pasquale
    Raso, Gianluigi
    Fantozzi, Marco
    Pira, Matteo
    Prata, Salvatore Mario
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Scarpa, Roberto Mario
    Papalia, Rocco
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [5] Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
    Hewitt, Matt
    O'Carroll, Michelle
    O'Reilly, Barry
    OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2011, 13 (03) : 183 - 188
  • [6] Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Filomena, Giovanni Battista
    Moretto, Stefano
    Marino, Filippo
    Cotrufo, Simone
    Francocci, Alessandra
    Maselli, Francesco Paolo
    Cardo, Giuseppe
    Pagliarulo, Giovanni
    Rizzo, Pierluigi
    Russo, Pierluigi
    Di Dio, Michele
    Alba, Stefano
    Calbi, Roberto
    Romano, Michele
    Zazzara, Michele
    Ludovico, Giuseppe Mario
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [7] Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center
    van Iersel, Jan J.
    Jonkers, Hendrik A. Formijne
    Paulides, Tim J. C.
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    Broeders, Ivo A. M. J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (11) : 1215 - 1223
  • [8] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    De Loof, Manon
    Rebuffo, Silvia
    Piramide, Federico
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Paciotti, Marco
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Nocera, Luigi
    Sarchi, Luca
    Peraire, Maria
    Colla'-Ruvolo, Claudia
    Frego, Nicola
    Piro, Adele
    Ticonosco, Marco
    De Backer, Pieter
    Farinha, Rui
    Bossche, Hannes Van Den
    De Naeyer, Geert
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    De Groote, Ruben
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (01): : 107 - 114
  • [9] Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: An Initial Experience
    Ho, Allen L.
    Pendharkar, Arjun V.
    Brewster, Ryan
    Martinez, Derek L.
    Jaffe, Richard A.
    Xu, Linda W.
    Miller, Kai J.
    Halpern, Casey H.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 17 (04) : 424 - 431
  • [10] Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery
    Coratti, A.
    Annecchiarico, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (06) : 593 - 594