Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production based on nuclear energy

被引:29
作者
Mendrela, Piotr [1 ]
Stanek, Wojciech [1 ]
Simla, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Tech Univ, Dept Thermal Technol, Konarskiego 22, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
POWER-TO-GAS; PRODUCTION OPTIONS; ELECTRICITY; SYSTEM; PLANT; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.156
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is expected to be a key energy carrier in the global energy transition. A promising method of hydrogen production is water electrolysis powered by nuclear energy. This energy source can also be used in other hydrogen production technologies, such as copperchlorine cycle. Proper comparison of various hydrogen production methods from the sustainability perspective requires the use of analysis in a global balance boundary. The paper presents a comparison of sustainability of various hydrogen generation methods, with emphasis on the methods exploiting nuclear energy. Instead of local energy efficiency, the index of Thermo-Ecological Cost (TEC) is proposed. TEC is a measure of the depletion of non-renewable resources burdening the production of a given product. Other criteria used in the assessment are: availability of energy supply (capacity factor), cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and resources to production ratio. In addition, water electrolysis and copper-chlorine cycle have been considered cogeneration processes, providing oxygen as a useful by-product. Taking into account all the criteria suggests that obtaining hydrogen with the use of nuclear technologies will provide a fair, long-term compromise compared to other hydrogen generation technologies. (c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 744
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) :1-12
[2]   Production of hydrogen-rich syngas from novel processes for gasification of petroleum cokes and coals [J].
Al-Zareer, Maan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (20) :11577-11592
[3]   Oxygen Specific Power Consumption Comparison for Air Separation Units [J].
Alsultanny, Yas A. ;
Al-Shammari, Nayef N. .
ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2014, 18 (02) :67-80
[4]   Evaluation of a potential reintroduction of nuclear energy in Italy to accelerate the energy transition [J].
Bersano A. ;
Segantin S. ;
Falcone N. ;
Panella B. ;
Testoni R. .
Electricity Journal, 2020, 33 (07)
[5]  
Bhagwat S., 2020, Green Hydrogen: Bridging the Energy Transition in Africa and Europe
[6]   Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (33) :21559-21570
[7]   Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen, methanol and electric vehicles from well to wheel [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (06) :3767-3777
[8]   A high-resolution geospatial assessment of the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in the European Union [J].
Bodis, Katalin ;
Kougias, Ioannis ;
Jager-Waldau, Arnulf ;
Taylor, Nigel ;
Szabo, Sandor .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 114
[9]  
British Petroleum (BP), 2020, STAT REV WORLD ENERG
[10]  
Celinski Z, 1984, Podstawy energetyki jadrowej